These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24615859)

  • 1. Risk prediction with machine learning and regression methods.
    Steyerberg EW; van der Ploeg T; Van Calster B
    Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):601-6. PubMed ID: 24615859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Class probability estimation for medical studies.
    Simon R
    Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):597-600. PubMed ID: 24615788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What subject matter questions motivate the use of machine learning approaches compared to statistical models for probability prediction?
    Binder H
    Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):584-7. PubMed ID: 24615759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Machine learning versus statistical modeling.
    Boulesteix AL; Schmid M
    Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):588-93. PubMed ID: 24615669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variable selection in large margin classifier-based probability estimation with high-dimensional predictors.
    Shin SJ; Wu Y
    Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):594-6. PubMed ID: 24615809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probability estimation with machine learning methods for dichotomous and multicategory outcome: theory.
    Kruppa J; Liu Y; Biau G; Kohler M; König IR; Malley JD; Ziegler A
    Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):534-63. PubMed ID: 24478134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rejoinder.
    Ziegler A
    Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):607-13. PubMed ID: 24737667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probability estimation with machine learning methods for dichotomous and multicategory outcome: applications.
    Kruppa J; Liu Y; Diener HC; Holste T; Weimar C; König IR; Ziegler A
    Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):564-83. PubMed ID: 24989843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uncertainty quantification and integration of machine learning techniques for predicting acid rock drainage chemistry: a probability bounds approach.
    Betrie GD; Sadiq R; Morin KA; Tesfamariam S
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Aug; 490():182-90. PubMed ID: 24852616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Introduction to machine learning.
    Baştanlar Y; Ozuysal M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1107():105-28. PubMed ID: 24272434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploiting uncertainty measures in compounds activity prediction using support vector machines.
    Smusz S; Czarnecki WM; Warszycki D; Bojarski AJ
    Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2015 Jan; 25(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 25466199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the construction of the relevance vector machine based on Bayesian Ying-Yang harmony learning.
    Cheng D; Nguyen MN; Gao J; Shi D
    Neural Netw; 2013 Dec; 48():173-9. PubMed ID: 24055959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative analysis of support vector machines and extreme learning machines.
    Liu X; Gao C; Li P
    Neural Netw; 2012 Sep; 33():58-66. PubMed ID: 22572469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Support vector machine-based prediction of local tumor control after stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.
    Klement RJ; Allgäuer M; Appold S; Dieckmann K; Ernst I; Ganswindt U; Holy R; Nestle U; Nevinny-Stickel M; Semrau S; Sterzing F; Wittig A; Andratschke N; Guckenberger M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Mar; 88(3):732-8. PubMed ID: 24411630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Training based on ligand efficiency improves prediction of bioactivities of ligands and drug target proteins in a machine learning approach.
    Sugaya N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2525-37. PubMed ID: 24020509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A machine learning-based approach to prognostic analysis of thoracic transplantations.
    Delen D; Oztekin A; Kong ZJ
    Artif Intell Med; 2010 May; 49(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 20153956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive weighted learning for unbalanced multicategory classification.
    Qiao X; Liu Y
    Biometrics; 2009 Mar; 65(1):159-68. PubMed ID: 18363773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discussion of "the evolution of boosting algorithms" and "extending statistical boosting".
    Bühlmann P; Gertheiss J; Hieke S; Kneib T; Ma S; Schumacher M; Tutz G; Wang CY; Wang Z; Ziegler A
    Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(6):436-45. PubMed ID: 25396219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing transition states via kernel-based machine learning.
    Pozun ZD; Hansen K; Sheppard D; Rupp M; Müller KR; Henkelman G
    J Chem Phys; 2012 May; 136(17):174101. PubMed ID: 22583204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ensemble learning incorporating uncertain registration.
    Simpson IJ; Woolrich MW; Andersson JL; Groves AR; Schnabel JA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Apr; 32(4):748-56. PubMed ID: 23288332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.