169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24617175)
1. Cone beam CT: non-dental applications.
Casselman JW; Gieraerts K; Volders D; Delanote J; Mermuys K; De Foer B; Swennen G
JBR-BTR; 2013; 96(6):333-53. PubMed ID: 24617175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cone beam CT paranasal sinuses versus standard multidetector and low dose multidetector CT studies.
Al Abduwani J; ZilinSkiene L; Colley S; Ahmed S
Am J Otolaryngol; 2016; 37(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 26700263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial imaging: dose matters.
Pauwels R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):156-61. PubMed ID: 25805884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cone beam computed tomography for the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses.
Parks ET
Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jul; 58(3):627-51. PubMed ID: 24993926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Maal T; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20044238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of craniofacial asymmetry based on cone-beam CT image].
Zhang XY; Xu TM
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Feb; 45(1):156-61. PubMed ID: 23411540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Applications of cone-beam computed tomography in fractures of the maxillofacial complex.
Shintaku WH; Venturin JS; Azevedo B; Noujeim M
Dent Traumatol; 2009 Aug; 25(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 19515071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cone beam tomographic imaging anatomy of the maxillofacial region.
Angelopoulos C
Dent Clin North Am; 2008 Oct; 52(4):731-52, vi. PubMed ID: 18805226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Indications of cone beam CT in head and neck imaging.
Stutzki M; Jahns E; Mandapathil MM; Diogo I; Werner JA; Güldner C
Acta Otolaryngol; 2015; 135(12):1337-43. PubMed ID: 26313160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cone-beam computed tomography: accuracy of three-dimensional cephalometry analysis and influence of patient scanning position.
Frongia G; Piancino MG; Bracco P
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 23(4):1038-43. PubMed ID: 22777473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multidetector CT and cone-beam CT have substantial agreement in detecting dental and sinus abnormalities in equine cadaver heads.
van Zadelhoff C; Liuti T; Dixon PM; Reardon RJM
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2021 Jul; 62(4):413-420. PubMed ID: 33987964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do CBCT scans alter surgical treatment plans? Comparison of preoperative surgical diagnosis using panoramic versus cone-beam CT images.
Wolff C; Mücke T; Wagenpfeil S; Kanatas A; Bissinger O; Deppe H
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 44(10):1700-1705. PubMed ID: 27567358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.
Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G
Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data.
Codari M; Caffini M; Tartaglia GM; Sforza C; Baselli G
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Jan; 12(1):113-121. PubMed ID: 27358080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implant-guided volumetric analysis of edentulous maxillary bone with cone-beam computerized tomography scan. Maxillary sinus pneumatization classification.
Tolstunov L; Thai D; Arellano L
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Aug; 38(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 22913308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of Head Motion on the Accuracy of 3D Reconstruction with Cone-Beam CT: Landmark Identification Errors in Maxillofacial Surface Model.
Lee KM; Song JM; Cho JH; Hwang HS
PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153210. PubMed ID: 27065238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Imaging diagnosis of the temporal bone and nasal-paranasal sinuses using cone-beam CT].
Ogawa Y
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2012 Mar; 115(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 22690416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
