These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24617612)

  • 1. Stimulus duration and diversity do not reverse the advantage for superordinate-level representations: the animal is seen before the bird.
    Poncet M; Fabre-Thorpe M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2014 May; 39(9):1508-16. PubMed ID: 24617612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The time-course of visual categorizations: you spot the animal faster than the bird.
    Macé MJ; Joubert OR; Nespoulous JL; Fabre-Thorpe M
    PLoS One; 2009 Jun; 4(6):e5927. PubMed ID: 19536292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. At 120 msec you can spot the animal but you don't yet know it's a dog.
    Wu CT; Crouzet SM; Thorpe SJ; Fabre-Thorpe M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 27(1):141-9. PubMed ID: 25208739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Processing Speed of Scene Categorization at Multiple Levels of Description: The Superordinate Advantage Revisited.
    Banno H; Saiki J
    Perception; 2015 Mar; 44(3):269-88. PubMed ID: 26562252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The dynamics of categorization: Unraveling rapid categorization.
    Mack ML; Palmeri TJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Jun; 144(3):551-69. PubMed ID: 25938178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decoupling object detection and categorization.
    Mack ML; Palmeri TJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1067-79. PubMed ID: 20731505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Object Categorization Processing Differs According to Category Level: Comparing Visual Information Between the Basic and Superordinate Levels.
    Taniguchi K; Kuraguchi K; Takano Y; Itakura S
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():501. PubMed ID: 32269541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semantic categorization precedes affective evaluation of visual scenes.
    Nummenmaa L; Hyönä J; Calvo MG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):222-46. PubMed ID: 20438250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A need for more information uptake but not focused attention to access basic-level representations.
    Poncet M; Reddy L; Fabre-Thorpe M
    J Vis; 2012 Jan; 12(1):15. PubMed ID: 22262913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recurrent processing enhances visual awareness but is not necessary for fast categorization of natural scenes.
    Koivisto M; Kastrati G; Revonsuo A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 26(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 24047378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unconscious vision spots the animal but not the dog: Masked priming of natural scenes.
    Koivisto M; Rientamo E
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 Apr; 41():10-23. PubMed ID: 26837047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Object Categorization in Finer Levels Relies More on Higher Spatial Frequencies and Takes Longer.
    Ashtiani MN; Kheradpisheh SR; Masquelier T; Ganjtabesh M
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1261. PubMed ID: 28790954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time course of visual object categorization: fastest does not necessarily mean first.
    Mack ML; Wong AC; Gauthier I; Tanaka JW; Palmeri TJ
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(15):1961-8. PubMed ID: 19460401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid categorization of achromatic natural scenes: how robust at very low contrasts?
    Macé MJ; Thorpe SJ; Fabre-Thorpe M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Apr; 21(7):2007-18. PubMed ID: 15869494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Processing scene context: fast categorization and object interference.
    Joubert OR; Rousselet GA; Fize D; Fabre-Thorpe M
    Vision Res; 2007 Dec; 47(26):3286-97. PubMed ID: 17967472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The speed and accuracy of material recognition in natural images.
    Wiebel CB; Valsecchi M; Gegenfurtner KR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):954-66. PubMed ID: 23456971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The characteristics and limits of rapid visual categorization.
    Fabre-Thorpe M
    Front Psychol; 2011; 2():243. PubMed ID: 22007180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of stimulus duration and choice delay on visual categorization in pigeons.
    Lazareva OF; Wasserman EA
    Learn Motiv; 2009 May; 40(2):132-146. PubMed ID: 20161256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Categorizing objects in isolation and in scenes: what a superordinate is good for.
    Murphy GL; Wisniewski EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jul; 15(4):572-86. PubMed ID: 2526854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neurophysiological evidence for the time course of activation of global shape, part, and local contour representations during visual object categorization and memory.
    Schendan HE; Kutas M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 May; 19(5):734-49. PubMed ID: 17488201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.