These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24617736)
1. What is the best option for failed sphincter repair? Hong KD; da Silva G; Wexner SD Colorectal Dis; 2014 Apr; 16(4):298-303. PubMed ID: 24617736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Value of sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of severe faecal incontinence: a comparison to the artificial bowel sphincter. Meurette G; La Torre M; Regenet N; Robert-Yap J; Lehur PA Colorectal Dis; 2009 Jul; 11(6):631-5. PubMed ID: 18637936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence related to external sphincter atrophy. Santoro GA; Infantino A; Cancian L; Battistella G; Di Falco G Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jul; 55(7):797-805. PubMed ID: 22706133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sacral nerve neuromodulation is effective treatment for fecal incontinence in the presence of a sphincter defect, pudendal neuropathy, or previous sphincter repair. Brouwer R; Duthie G Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Mar; 53(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20173472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sacral nerve stimulation is a valid approach in fecal incontinence due to sphincter lesions when compared to sphincter repair. Ratto C; Litta F; Parello A; Donisi L; Doglietto GB Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Mar; 53(3):264-72. PubMed ID: 20173471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sacral nerve stimulation is more effective than optimal medical therapy for severe fecal incontinence: a randomized, controlled study. Tjandra JJ; Chan MK; Yeh CH; Murray-Green C Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 May; 51(5):494-502. PubMed ID: 18278532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation vs sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: a comparative case-matched study. Al Asari S; Meurette G; Mantoo S; Kubis C; Wyart V; Lehur PA Colorectal Dis; 2014 Nov; 16(11):O393-9. PubMed ID: 24911219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Overlapping sphincter repair: does age matter? El-Gazzaz G; Zutshi M; Hannaway C; Gurland B; Hull T Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Mar; 55(3):256-61. PubMed ID: 22469791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does the magnetic anal sphincter device compare favourably with sacral nerve stimulation in the management of faecal incontinence? Wong MT; Meurette G; Wyart V; Lehur PA Colorectal Dis; 2012 Jun; 14(6):e323-9. PubMed ID: 22339789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is a morphologically intact anal sphincter necessary for success with sacral nerve modulation in patients with faecal incontinence? Melenhorst J; Koch SM; Uludag O; van Gemert WG; Baeten CG Colorectal Dis; 2008 Mar; 10(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 17949447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence in patients with anal sphincter defects. Boyle DJ; Knowles CH; Lunniss PJ; Scott SM; Williams NS; Gill KA Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Jul; 52(7):1234-9. PubMed ID: 19571698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Technical and functional results of the artificial bowel sphincter for treatment of severe fecal incontinence: is there any benefit for the patient? Darnis B; Faucheron JL; Damon H; Barth X Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Apr; 56(4):505-10. PubMed ID: 23478619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of life is markedly improved in patients with fecal incontinence after sacral nerve stimulation. Devroede G; Giese C; Wexner SD; Mellgren A; Coller JA; Madoff RD; Hull T; Stromberg K; Iyer S; Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 22453321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]