These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Comparison of composite measure methodologies for rewarding quality of care: an analysis from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines program. Eapen ZJ; Fonarow GC; Dai D; O'Brien SM; Schwamm LH; Cannon CP; Heidenreich PA; Bhatt DL; Peterson ED; Hernandez AF; Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2011 Nov; 4(6):610-8. PubMed ID: 22010200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Do hospitals and surgeons with higher coronary artery bypass graft surgery volumes still have lower risk-adjusted mortality rates? Hannan EL; Wu C; Ryan TJ; Bennett E; Culliford AT; Gold JP; Hartman A; Isom OW; Jones RH; McNeil B; Rose EA; Subramanian VA Circulation; 2003 Aug; 108(7):795-801. PubMed ID: 12885743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Medicare program; hospital inpatient prospective payment systems for acute care hospitals and the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and fiscal year 2015 rates; quality reporting requirements for specific providers; reasonable compensation equivalents for physician services in excluded hospitals and certain teaching hospitals; provider administrative appeals and judicial review; enforcement provisions for organ transplant centers; and electronic health record (EHR) incentive program. Final rule. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS Fed Regist; 2014 Aug; 79(163):49853-50536. PubMed ID: 25167590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Hospital report cards: intent, impact, and illusion. Rosenstein AH Am J Med Qual; 2004; 19(5):183-92. PubMed ID: 15532910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cardiac surgery report cards: comprehensive review and statistical critique. Shahian DM; Normand SL; Torchiana DF; Lewis SM; Pastore JO; Kuntz RE; Dreyer PI Ann Thorac Surg; 2001 Dec; 72(6):2155-68. PubMed ID: 11789828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of changing the statistical methodology on hospital and surgeon ranking: the case of the New York State cardiac surgery report card. Glance LG; Dick A; Osler TM; Li Y; Mukamel DB Med Care; 2006 Apr; 44(4):311-9. PubMed ID: 16565631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. When policy meets statistics: the very real effect that questionable statistical analysis has on limiting health care access for bariatric surgery. Livingston EH; Elliott AC; Hynan LS; Engel E Arch Surg; 2007 Oct; 142(10):979-87. PubMed ID: 17938312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Hospital case volume and appropriate prescriptions at hospital discharge after acute myocardial infarction: a nationwide assessment. Schiele F; Capuano F; Loirat P; Desplanques-Leperre A; Derumeaux G; Thebaut JF; Gardel C; Grenier C Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2013 Jan; 6(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 23233747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The relationships among physician and hospital volume, processes, and outcomes of care for acute myocardial infarction. Tung YC; Chang GM; Chien KL; Tu YK Med Care; 2014 Jun; 52(6):519-27. PubMed ID: 24783991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Myocardial infarction and heart failure hospitalization rates in Maine, USA - variability along the urban-rural continuum. Harris DE; Aboueissa AM; Hartley D Rural Remote Health; 2008; 8(2):980. PubMed ID: 18627216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Risk-adjusting acute myocardial infarction mortality: are APR-DRGs the right tool? Romano PS; Chan BK Health Serv Res; 2000 Mar; 34(7):1469-89. PubMed ID: 10737448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Peer group benchmarks are not appropriate for health care quality report cards. Romano PS Am Heart J; 2004 Dec; 148(6):921-3. PubMed ID: 15632872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of case volume on hospital performance assessment. O'Brien SM; Delong ER; Peterson ED Arch Intern Med; 2008 Jun; 168(12):1277-84. PubMed ID: 18574084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Exploring willingness and related factors by using the healthcare report cards for hospitals in Taiwan. Lin HC Chang Gung Med J; 2003 May; 26(5):330-8. PubMed ID: 12934849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The failure of four bootstrap procedures for estimating confidence intervals for predicted-to-expected ratios for hospital profiling. Austin PC BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Oct; 22(1):271. PubMed ID: 36241973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Do popular media and internet-based hospital quality ratings identify hospitals with better cardiovascular surgery outcomes? Osborne NH; Nicholas LH; Ghaferi AA; Upchurch GR; Dimick JB J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Jan; 210(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 20123337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comment on "the relationship between the C-statistic of a risk-adjustment model and the accuracy of hospital report cards: a Monte Carlo study". Huesch MD; Ong MK; Fonarow GC Med Care; 2013 Jul; 51(7):633. PubMed ID: 23685404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The impact of under coding of cardiac severity and comorbid diseases on the accuracy of hospital report cards. Austin PC; Tu JV; Alter DA; Naylor CD Med Care; 2005 Aug; 43(8):801-9. PubMed ID: 16034294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ranking hospital performance based on individual indicators: can we increase reliability by creating composite indicators? Austin PC; Ceyisakar IE; Steyerberg EW; Lingsma HF; Marang-van de Mheen PJ BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):131. PubMed ID: 31242857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]