BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24620404)

  • 1. Carbon dioxide emission tallies for 210 U.S. coal-fired power plants: a comparison of two accounting methods.
    Quick JC
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Jan; 64(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 24620404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic error and uncertain carbon dioxide emissions from U.S. power plants.
    Quick JC; Marland E
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 May; 69(5):646-658. PubMed ID: 30735479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benefits of current and future policies on emissions of China's coal-fired power sector indicated by continuous emission monitoring.
    Zhang Y; Bo X; Zhao Y; Nielsen CP
    Environ Pollut; 2019 Aug; 251():415-424. PubMed ID: 31103001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response to comments by Gurney et al. regarding "Carbon dioxide emission tallies for 210 U.S. coal-fired power plants: a comparison of two accounting methods".
    Quick JC
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Nov; 64(11):1218-20. PubMed ID: 25509543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comment on Quick, J. C. 2014. Carbon dioxide emission tallies for 210 U.S. coal-fired power plants: a comparison of two accounting methods. J Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 64: 73-79.
    Gurney KR; Haung J; Coltin K
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Nov; 64(11):1215-7. PubMed ID: 25509542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Potential flue gas impurities in carbon dioxide streams separated from coal-fired power plants.
    Lee JY; Keener TC; Yang YJ
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2009 Jun; 59(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 19603740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigation of aerosol and gas emissions from a coal-fired power plant under various operating conditions.
    Li Z; Wang Y; Lu Y; Biswas P
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Jan; 69(1):34-46. PubMed ID: 30047848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-nulling protocols for fast, accurate, 3-D velocity measurements in stacks.
    Shinder II; Johnson AN; Filla BJ; Khromchenko VB; Moldover MR; Boyd J; Wright JD; Stoup J
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2023 Aug; 73(8):600-617. PubMed ID: 37506216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characteristics of particle emissions and their atmospheric dilution during co-combustion of coal and wood pellets in a large combined heat and power plant.
    Mylläri F; Pirjola L; Lihavainen H; Asmi E; Saukko E; Laurila T; Vakkari V; O'Connor E; Rautiainen J; Häyrinen A; Niemelä V; Maunula J; Hillamo R; Keskinen J; Rönkkö T
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Jan; 69(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 30204539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
    Clark VR; Herzog HJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The oxycoal process with cryogenic oxygen supply.
    Kather A; Scheffknecht G
    Naturwissenschaften; 2009 Sep; 96(9):993-1010. PubMed ID: 19495717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Water impacts of CO2 emission performance standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants.
    Talati S; Zhai H; Morgan MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(20):11769-76. PubMed ID: 25229670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Current Emissions and Future Mitigation Pathways of Coal-Fired Power Plants in China from 2010 to 2030.
    Tong D; Zhang Q; Liu F; Geng G; Zheng Y; Xue T; Hong C; Wu R; Qin Y; Zhao H; Yan L; He K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Nov; 52(21):12905-12914. PubMed ID: 30249091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recent increases in nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from coal-fired electric generating units equipped with selective catalytic reduction.
    McNevin TF
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Jan; 66(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 26563500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the emission characteristics of trace metals from coal and fuel oil fired power plants and their fate during combustion.
    Reddy MS; Basha S; Joshi HV; Jha B
    J Hazard Mater; 2005 Aug; 123(1-3):242-9. PubMed ID: 15916850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiscale observations of CO2, 13CO2, and pollutants at Four Corners for emission verification and attribution.
    Lindenmaier R; Dubey MK; Henderson BG; Butterfield ZT; Herman JR; Rahn T; Lee SH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jun; 111(23):8386-91. PubMed ID: 24843169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating measurements of carbon dioxide emissions using a precision source--A natural gas burner.
    Bryant R; Bundy M; Zong R
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Jul; 65(7):863-70. PubMed ID: 26079560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decadal emission estimates of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitric oxide emissions from coal burning in electric power generation plants in India.
    Mittal ML; Sharma C; Singh R
    Environ Monit Assess; 2014 Oct; 186(10):6857-66. PubMed ID: 25004854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of two U.S. power-plant carbon dioxide emissions data sets.
    Ackerman KV; Sundquist ET
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Aug; 42(15):5688-93. PubMed ID: 18754494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.