BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24621177)

  • 1. A pipeline for the de novo assembly of the Themira biloba (Sepsidae: Diptera) transcriptome using a multiple k-mer length approach.
    Melicher D; Torson AS; Dworkin I; Bowsher JH
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Mar; 15(1):188. PubMed ID: 24621177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative performance of transcriptome assembly methods for non-model organisms.
    Huang X; Chen XG; Armbruster PA
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Jul; 17():523. PubMed ID: 27464550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Challenges and advances for transcriptome assembly in non-model species.
    Ungaro A; Pech N; Martin JF; McCairns RJS; Mévy JP; Chappaz R; Gilles A
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0185020. PubMed ID: 28931057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimization of de novo transcriptome assembly from high-throughput short read sequencing data improves functional annotation for non-model organisms.
    Haznedaroglu BZ; Reeves D; Rismani-Yazdi H; Peccia J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 13():170. PubMed ID: 22808927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimization of de novo transcriptome assembly from next-generation sequencing data.
    Surget-Groba Y; Montoya-Burgos JI
    Genome Res; 2010 Oct; 20(10):1432-40. PubMed ID: 20693479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PARRoT- a homology-based strategy to quantify and compare RNA-sequencing from non-model organisms.
    Gan RC; Chen TW; Wu TH; Huang PJ; Lee CC; Yeh YM; Chiu CH; Huang HD; Tang P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 19):513. PubMed ID: 28155708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of De Novo Transcriptome Assemblers and k-mer Strategies Using the Killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus.
    Rana SB; Zadlock FJ; Zhang Z; Murphy WR; Bentivegna CS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153104. PubMed ID: 27054874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Construction of a public CHO cell line transcript database using versatile bioinformatics analysis pipelines.
    Rupp O; Becker J; Brinkrolf K; Timmermann C; Borth N; Pühler A; Noll T; Goesmann A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85568. PubMed ID: 24427317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining transcriptome assemblies from multiple de novo assemblers in the allo-tetraploid plant Nicotiana benthamiana.
    Nakasugi K; Crowhurst R; Bally J; Waterhouse P
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91776. PubMed ID: 24614631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inferring bona fide transfrags in RNA-Seq derived-transcriptome assemblies of non-model organisms.
    Mbandi SK; Hesse U; van Heusden P; Christoffels A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16(1):58. PubMed ID: 25880035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined de novo and genome guided assembly and annotation of the Pinus patula juvenile shoot transcriptome.
    Visser EA; Wegrzyn JL; Steenkmap ET; Myburg AA; Naidoo S
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Dec; 16():1057. PubMed ID: 26652261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A quantitative reference transcriptome for Nematostella vectensis early embryonic development: a pipeline for de novo assembly in emerging model systems.
    Tulin S; Aguiar D; Istrail S; Smith J
    Evodevo; 2013; 4():16. PubMed ID: 23731568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A differential k-mer analysis pipeline for comparing RNA-Seq transcriptome and meta-transcriptome datasets without a reference.
    Chan CK; Rosic N; Lorenc MT; Visendi P; Lin M; Kaniewska P; Ferguson BJ; Gresshoff PM; Batley J; Edwards D
    Funct Integr Genomics; 2019 Mar; 19(2):363-371. PubMed ID: 30483906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficient assembly and annotation of the transcriptome of catfish by RNA-Seq analysis of a doubled haploid homozygote.
    Liu S; Zhang Y; Zhou Z; Waldbieser G; Sun F; Lu J; Zhang J; Jiang Y; Zhang H; Wang X; Rajendran KV; Khoo L; Kucuktas H; Peatman E; Liu Z
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Nov; 13():595. PubMed ID: 23127152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. De novo Transcriptome Assemblies of Rana (Lithobates) catesbeiana and Xenopus laevis Tadpole Livers for Comparative Genomics without Reference Genomes.
    Birol I; Behsaz B; Hammond SA; Kucuk E; Veldhoen N; Helbing CC
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130720. PubMed ID: 26121473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combining independent de novo assemblies to optimize leaf transcriptome of Persian walnut.
    Sadat-Hosseini M; Bakhtiarizadeh MR; Boroomand N; Tohidfar M; Vahdati K
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0232005. PubMed ID: 32343733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Re-assembly, quality evaluation, and annotation of 678 microbial eukaryotic reference transcriptomes.
    Johnson LK; Alexander H; Brown CT
    Gigascience; 2019 Apr; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 30544207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A survey of the complex transcriptome from the highly polyploid sugarcane genome using full-length isoform sequencing and de novo assembly from short read sequencing.
    Hoang NV; Furtado A; Mason PJ; Marquardt A; Kasirajan L; Thirugnanasambandam PP; Botha FC; Henry RJ
    BMC Genomics; 2017 May; 18(1):395. PubMed ID: 28532419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved annotation with de novo transcriptome assembly in four social amoeba species.
    Singh R; Lawal HM; Schilde C; Glöckner G; Barton GJ; Schaap P; Cole C
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):120. PubMed ID: 28143409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving transcriptome construction in non-model organisms: integrating manual and automated gene definition in Emiliania huxleyi.
    Feldmesser E; Rosenwasser S; Vardi A; Ben-Dor S
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Feb; 15():148. PubMed ID: 24559402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.