These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24621329)
21. Pure or tarnished: are systematic reviews blind or biased? Lanzafame RJ Photomed Laser Surg; 2005 Oct; 23(5):451-2. PubMed ID: 16262572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Systematic reviews are not biased by results from trials stopped early for benefit. Goodman SN J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 61(1):95-6; author reply 96-8. PubMed ID: 18083466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors. Hayden JA; van der Windt DA; Cartwright JL; Côté P; Bombardier C Ann Intern Med; 2013 Feb; 158(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 23420236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Aggregation bias and the use of regression in evaluating models of human performance. Walker N; Catrambone R Hum Factors; 1993 Sep; 35(3):397-411. PubMed ID: 8244408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Systematic reviews: let's keep them trustworthy. Garcia-Doval I; van Zuuren EJ; Bath-Hextall F; Ingram JR Br J Dermatol; 2017 Oct; 177(4):888-889. PubMed ID: 29052884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Should The Cochrane Collaboration be producing reviews of efficiency? Drummond M; Shemilt I; Vale L; Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Nov; 2013(10):ED000071. PubMed ID: 24475486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Technology-assisted risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews requires precise definitions of risk of bias. Puljak L J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():168-169. PubMed ID: 29535010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Reviewers recognized for outstanding reviews in 2020. Vet Clin Pathol; 2021 Mar; 50(1):121. PubMed ID: 33719064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Where is the risk of bias? Considering intervention reporting quality. Gordon M Med Educ; 2017 Aug; 51(8):874-875. PubMed ID: 28378914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Risk of bias: Worse than it appears. Berger VW Int J Nurs Pract; 2016 Feb; 22(1):111. PubMed ID: 26916061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Very high risk of bias. Pires Dos Santos AP; Nadanovsky P; Nunan D Br Dent J; 2023 Jun; 234(11):783. PubMed ID: 37291286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of Exercise Modality on Heart Rate Variability in Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Yang F; Ma Y; Liang S; Shi Y; Wang C Rev Cardiovasc Med; 2024 Jan; 25(1):9. PubMed ID: 39077654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]