These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24621402)

  • 1. A multivariate analysis of genetic variation in the advertisement call of the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor.
    Welch AM; Smith MJ; Gerhardt HC
    Evolution; 2014 Jun; 68(6):1629-39. PubMed ID: 24621402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems.
    Gerhardt HC
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 15807424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vasotocin maintains multiple call types in the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor.
    Tito MB; Hoover MA; Mingo AM; Boyd SK
    Horm Behav; 1999 Oct; 36(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 10506540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic benefits of a female mating preference in gray tree frogs are context-dependent.
    Welch AM
    Evolution; 2003 Apr; 57(4):883-93. PubMed ID: 12778557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multivariate phenotypic selection on a complex sexual signal.
    Tanner JC; Ward JL; Shaw RG; Bee MA
    Evolution; 2017 Jul; 71(7):1742-1754. PubMed ID: 28474734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interference risk and the function of dynamic shifts in calling in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor).
    Schwartz JJ; Brown R; Turner S; Dushaj K; Castano M
    J Comp Psychol; 2008 Aug; 122(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 18729656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Larger females are choosier in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor).
    Kuczynski MC; Getty T; Gering E
    Behav Processes; 2017 Feb; 135():29-35. PubMed ID: 27913165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Context and condition dependent plasticity in sexual signaling in gray treefrogs.
    Kuczynski MC; Gering E; Getty T
    Behav Processes; 2016 Mar; 124():74-9. PubMed ID: 26706029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preferences based on spectral differences in acoustic signals in four species of treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae).
    Gerhardt HC; Martínez-Rivera CC; Schwartz JJ; Marshall VT; Murphy CG
    J Exp Biol; 2007 Sep; 210(Pt 17):2990-8. PubMed ID: 17704074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hormonal modulation of phonotaxis and advertisement-call preferences in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor).
    Gordon NM; Gerhardt HC
    Horm Behav; 2009 Jan; 55(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 18926827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Glucocorticoid-Mediated Changes in Male Green Treefrog Vocalizations Alter Attractiveness to Females.
    Leary CJ; Crocker-Buta S; Holloway A; Kennedy JGC
    Integr Comp Biol; 2021 Jul; 61(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 33940612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Geographic variation in advertisement calls in a tree frog species: gene flow and selection hypotheses.
    Jang Y; Hahm EH; Lee HJ; Park S; Won YJ; Choe JC
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(8):e23297. PubMed ID: 21858061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modality interactions alter the shape of acoustic mate preference functions in gray treefrogs.
    Reichert MS; Höbel G
    Evolution; 2015 Sep; 69(9):2384-98. PubMed ID: 26282702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patterns of mating call preferences in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus.
    Ryan MJ; Bernal XE; Rand AS
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Nov; 20(6):2235-47. PubMed ID: 17956386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs.
    Welch AM; Semlitsch RD; Gerhardt HC
    Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5371):1928-30. PubMed ID: 9632389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensory biases in response to novel complex acoustic signals in male and female grey treefrogs,
    Reichert MS; de la Hera I
    Proc Biol Sci; 2022 Oct; 289(1984):20221306. PubMed ID: 36196544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of geographic heterogeneity in predation pressure on sexual signal divergence in an Amazonian frog species complex.
    Trillo PA; Athanas KA; Goldhill DH; Hoke KL; Funk WC
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Jan; 26(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 23181745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexual selection in female perceptual space: how female túngara frogs perceive and respond to complex population variation in acoustic mating signals.
    Ryan MJ; Rand AS
    Evolution; 2003 Nov; 57(11):2608-18. PubMed ID: 14686535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trade-offs and upper limits to signal performance during close-range vocal competition in gray tree frogs hyla versicolor.
    Reichert MS; Gerhardt HC
    Am Nat; 2012 Oct; 180(4):425-37. PubMed ID: 22976007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Condition-dependent traits and the capture of genetic variance in male advertisement song.
    Brandt LS; Greenfield MD
    J Evol Biol; 2004 Jul; 17(4):821-8. PubMed ID: 15271081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.