164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24621771)
1. Quality of implant anchored craniofacial and intraoral prostheses: patient's evaluation.
Smolarz-Wojnowska A; Raithel F; Gellrich NC; Klein C
J Craniofac Surg; 2014; 25(2):e202-7. PubMed ID: 24621771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Craniofacial prostheses for facial defects].
Federspil PA
HNO; 2010 Jun; 58(6):621-31; quiz 632. PubMed ID: 20393689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Osseointegrated implants and auricular defects: a case series study.
Wright RF; Zemnick C; Wazen JJ; Asher E
J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):468-75. PubMed ID: 18544137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Implant retained epistheses for facial defects].
Federspil PA
Laryngorhinootologie; 2009 May; 88 Suppl 1():S125-38. PubMed ID: 19353454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extraoral implants in the rehabilitation of craniofacial defects: implant and prosthesis survival rates and peri-implant soft tissue evaluation.
Curi MM; Oliveira MF; Molina G; Cardoso CL; Oliveira Lde G; Branemark PI; Ribeiro Kde C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1551-7. PubMed ID: 22698291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival rates and periimplant soft tissue evaluation of extraoral implants over a mean follow-up period of three years.
Karakoca S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bal BT
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):458-64. PubMed ID: 19033030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retrospective study of treatment outcomes with implant-retained extraoral prostheses: survival rates and prosthetic complications.
Karakoca S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bal BT
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 20141816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment satisfaction with facial prostheses.
Chang TL; Garrett N; Roumanas E; Beumer J
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 16126080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fate of implant-retained craniofacial prostheses: life span and aftercare.
Visser A; Raghoebar GM; van Oort RP; Vissink A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 18416416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment outcome of bone-anchored craniofacial prostheses after tumor surgery.
Schoen PJ; Raghoebar GM; van Oort RP; Reintsema H; van der Laan BF; Burlage FR; Roodenburg JL; Vissink A
Cancer; 2001 Dec; 92(12):3045-50. PubMed ID: 11753982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Craniofacial implant surgery.
Sinn DP; Bedrossian E; Vest AK
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2011 May; 23(2):321-35, vi-vii. PubMed ID: 21492804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implant-supported facial prostheses provided by a maxillofacial unit in a U.K. regional hospital: longevity and patient opinions.
Hooper SM; Westcott T; Evans PL; Bocca AP; Jagger DC
J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15733133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of implant anchorage on midface prostheses.
Arcuri MR; LaVelle WE; Fyler A; Funk G
J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Nov; 78(5):496-500. PubMed ID: 9399193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preclinical animal study and clinical trail of modified extraoral craniofacial implants.
Petrovic L; Schlegel KA; Wiltfang J; Neukam FW; Rupprecht S
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(6):615-21. PubMed ID: 17392045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrospective study of implant-retained orbital prostheses: implant survival and patient satisfaction.
Karakoca Nemli S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Sarisoy S; Kasko Y
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1178-83. PubMed ID: 20613601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implant-retained auricular prostheses: a clinical challenge.
Arora V; Sahoo NK; Gopi A; Saini DK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 45(5):631-5. PubMed ID: 26792146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patients' satisfaction with facial prostheses.
Wondergem M; Lieben G; Bouman S; van den Brekel MW; Lohuis PJ
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 54(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 26508540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of life of patients with implant-retained maxillofacial prostheses: a prospective and retrospective study.
Nemli SK; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bal BT; Arici YK
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 23328196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcomes after ear reconstruction with a Branemark-type, bone-anchored, ear prosthesis: a 16 year review.
Younis I; Gault D; Sabbagh W; Kang NV
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Oct; 63(10):1650-5. PubMed ID: 20356815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Fixation of facial and auricular prosthesis with osseous implants in cranial bone].
Raghoebar GM; van Oort RP; Dikkers FG; Reintsema H
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Mar; 142(10):525-8. PubMed ID: 9623100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
