175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2462219)
21. VDD(R) pacing: short- and long-term stability of atrial sensing with a single lead system.
Naegeli B; Osswald S; Pfisterer M; Burkart F
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Apr; 19(4 Pt 1):455-64. PubMed ID: 8848393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Myocardial demands of atrial-triggered versus fixed-rate ventricular pacing in patients with complete heart block.
Nordlander R; Pehrsson SK; Aström H; Karlsson J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Sep; 10(5):1154-9. PubMed ID: 2444940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A randomized double-blind crossover comparison of four rate-responsive pacing modes.
Sulke N; Chambers J; Dritsas A; Sowton E
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Mar; 17(3):696-706. PubMed ID: 1993790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. First-degree atrioventricular block. Clinical manifestations, indications for pacing, pacemaker management & consequences during cardiac resynchronization.
Barold SS; Ilercil A; Leonelli F; Herweg B
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2006 Nov; 17(2):139-52. PubMed ID: 17334913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment of the work capacity and relationship between rate response and exercise tolerance associated with activity-sensing rate-responsive ventricular pacing.
Faerestrand S; Breivik K; Ohm OJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Nov; 10(6):1277-90. PubMed ID: 2446275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Effect of AV synchronization and rate increase on hemodynamics and on atrial natriuretic peptide in patients with total AV block].
Lemke B; Gude J; von Dryander S; Barmeyer J; Braun BE; Krieg M
Z Kardiol; 1990 Aug; 79(8):547-56. PubMed ID: 2145704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of the acute and long-term hemodynamic effects of ventricular inhibited and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing.
Kruse I; Arnman K; Conradson TB; Rydén L
Circulation; 1982 May; 65(5):846-55. PubMed ID: 7074746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effects of rate responsive pacing on exercise performance in the postoperative univentricular heart.
Paridon SM; Karpawich PP; Pinsky WW
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jun; 16(6):1256-62. PubMed ID: 7686655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sustained improvement in exercise tolerance following physiological cardiac pacing.
Sutton R; Perrins EJ; Morley C; Chan SL
Eur Heart J; 1983 Nov; 4(11):781-5. PubMed ID: 6653589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The ventricular paced QT interval--the effects of rate and exercise.
Milne JR; Ward DE; Spurrell RA; Camm AJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1982 May; 5(3):352-8. PubMed ID: 6179053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Experience with activity sensing rate responsive ventricular pacing. A study based upon assessment of exercise tolerance.
Kaul U; Sundar AS; Bhatia ML
J Assoc Physicians India; 1989 May; 37(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 2613638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Atrial rate and increased work capacity during DDD pacing in patients with a high level atrioventricular block].
Doupal V; Lukl J; Heinc P
Cor Vasa; 1993; 35(4):152-6. PubMed ID: 8403940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing on ventilatory response to exercise in patients with complete AV block.
Tani M; Fujiki A; Asanoi H; Yoshida S; Tsuji H; Mizumaki K; Sasayama S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Oct; 15(10 Pt 1):1482-91. PubMed ID: 1383960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Importance of ventricular rate after mode switching during low intensity exercise as assessed by clinical symptoms and ventilatory gas exchange.
Brunner-La Rocca HP; Rickli H; Weilenmann D; Duru F; Candinas R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Jan; 23(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 10666751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Rate responsive pacing using the evoked QT principle. A physiological alternative to atrial synchronous pacemakers.
Donaldson RM; Rickards AF
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1983 Nov; 6(6):1344-9. PubMed ID: 6196745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pacemakers of the 1980s. An overview.
Sukhum P
Postgrad Med; 1986 Mar; 79(4):173-4, 177-83, 186-8. PubMed ID: 3952041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Randomised crossover trial of rate responsive Activitrax and conventional fixed rate ventricular pacing.
Lipkin DP; Buller N; Frenneaux M; Ludgate L; Lowe T; Webb SC; Krikler DM
Br Heart J; 1987 Dec; 58(6):613-6. PubMed ID: 3322351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Physiological importance of different atrioventricular intervals to improved exercise performance in patients with dual chamber pacemakers.
Haskell RJ; French WJ
Br Heart J; 1989 Jan; 61(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 2917098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Experience and implantation techniques with a new single-pass lead VDD pacing system.
Longo E; Catrini V
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Jul; 13(7):927-36. PubMed ID: 1695750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Usefulness of echocardiography to predict inappropriate atrial sensing in single-lead VDD pacing.
de Cock CC; Van Campen LC; Huygens J; Kamp O; Visser CA
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Sep; 22(9):1344-7. PubMed ID: 10527015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
