These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2462243)
1. Long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome: a comparison of clinical aspects among unpaced, ventricular inhibited paced, and physiologically paced groups. Sasaki Y; Shimotori M; Akahane K; Yonekura H; Hirano K; Endoh R; Koike S; Kawa S; Furuta S; Homma T Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 1):1575-83. PubMed ID: 2462243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing. Hesselson AB; Parsonnet V; Bernstein AD; Bonavita GJ J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Jun; 19(7):1542-9. PubMed ID: 1593051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term effect of VVI pacing on atrial and ventricular function in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Paxinos G; Katritsis D; Kakouros S; Toutouzas P; Camm AJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Apr; 21(4 Pt 1):728-34. PubMed ID: 9584304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Left atrial appendage function in patients with different pacing modes. Ertaş F; Güleç S; Dinçer I; Erol C; Tutar E; Güldal M; Karaoğuz R; Oral D Int J Cardiol; 2000 Apr; 73(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 10817851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost benefit analysis of single and dual chamber pacing for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. An economic sensitivity analysis of the literature. Sutton R; Bourgeois I Eur Heart J; 1996 Apr; 17(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 8733091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome. Andersen HR; Nielsen JC; Thomsen PE; Thuesen L; Mortensen PT; Vesterlund T; Pedersen AK Lancet; 1997 Oct; 350(9086):1210-6. PubMed ID: 9652562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physiologic atrial cardiac pacing for the prevention of chronic atrial fibrillation associated with sick sinus syndrome. Otaki M; Inoue T; Kaneda T; Oku H ASAIO J; 2002; 48(1):110-2. PubMed ID: 11814087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Pacemaker therapy for the sick sinus node syndrome. Does the atrially involved pacemaker system lower the frequency of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic complications as well as mortality?]. Hofgärtner F; Maier B; Eisele R; Hauber J; Sigel H Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1994 Dec; 119(49):1683-9. PubMed ID: 7988373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode. Brandt J; Anderson H; Fåhraeus T; Schüller H J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Sep; 20(3):633-9. PubMed ID: 1512343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relation of prognosis in sick sinus syndrome to age, conduction defects and modes of permanent cardiac pacing. Santini M; Alexidou G; Ansalone G; Cacciatore G; Cini R; Turitto G Am J Cardiol; 1990 Mar; 65(11):729-35. PubMed ID: 2316455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life. Lau CP; Tai YT; Leung WH; Wong CK; Lee P; Chung FL Eur Heart J; 1994 Nov; 15(11):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7835358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chronic atrial fibrillation and stroke in paced patients with sick sinus syndrome. Relevance of clinical characteristics and pacing modalities. Sgarbossa EB; Pinski SL; Maloney JD; Simmons TW; Wilkoff BL; Castle LW; Trohman RG Circulation; 1993 Sep; 88(3):1045-53. PubMed ID: 8353866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with different mode of pacing. Long-term follow-up. Folino AF; Buja G; Corso L Dal ; Nava A Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 2):260-3. PubMed ID: 9474684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences between atrial single chamber pacing (AAI) and ventricular single chamber pacing (VVI) with respect to prognosis and antiarrhythmic effect in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Stangl K; Seitz K; Wirtzfeld A; Alt E; Blömer H Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):2080-5. PubMed ID: 1704597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of atrial and VVI pacing modes in symptomatic sinus node dysfunction without associated tachyarrhythmias. Sethi KK; Bajaj V; Mohan JC; Arora R; Khalilullah M Indian Heart J; 1990; 42(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 2258196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. AV block and changes in pacing mode during long-term follow-up of 399 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome treated with an AAI/AAIR pacemaker. Kristensen L; Nielsen JC; Pedersen AK; Mortensen PT; Andersen HR Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Mar; 24(3):358-65. PubMed ID: 11310306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers. Rediker DE; Eagle KA; Homma S; Gillam LD; Harthorne JW Am J Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 61(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 3341209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]