308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24622551)
1. Comparative study on membrane fouling between membrane-coupled moving bed biofilm reactor and conventional membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment.
Yang W; Syed W; Zhou H
Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(5):1021-7. PubMed ID: 24622551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The characteristics of extracellular polymeric substances and soluble microbial products in moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor.
Duan L; Jiang W; Song Y; Xia S; Hermanowicz SW
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Nov; 148():436-42. PubMed ID: 24077152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of micropollutant removal and fouling reduction in a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor system.
Luo Y; Jiang Q; Ngo HH; Nghiem LD; Hai FI; Price WE; Wang J; Guo W
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Sep; 191():355-9. PubMed ID: 26031758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New functional biocarriers for enhancing the performance of a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor system.
Deng L; Guo W; Ngo HH; Zhang X; Wang XC; Zhang Q; Chen R
Bioresour Technol; 2016 May; 208():87-93. PubMed ID: 26926200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-stage biofilm-MBR for nitrogen removal and enhanced membrane performance.
Sun C; Leiknes T
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 22744690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Membrane fouling and performance evaluation of conventional membrane bioreactor (MBR), moving biofilm MBR and oxic/anoxic MBR.
Khan SJ; Ahmad A; Nawaz MS; Hankins NP
Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(7):1403-9. PubMed ID: 24718329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation between membrane fouling and soluble/colloidal organic substances in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment.
Lesjean B; Rosenberger S; Laabs C; Jekel M; Gnirss R; Amy G
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):1-8. PubMed ID: 16003955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of suspension viscosity and colloidal particles on permeability of membrane used in membrane bioreactor (MBR).
Itonaga T; Kimura K; Watanabe Y
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(12):301-9. PubMed ID: 15686035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of organic loading rate on a wastewater treatment process combining moving bed biofilm and membrane reactors.
Melin E; Leiknes T; Helness H; Rasmussen V; Odegaard H
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):421-30. PubMed ID: 16004004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between a fixed bed hybrid membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment: a pilot-scale study.
Rodríguez-Hernández L; Esteban-García AL; Tejero I
Bioresour Technol; 2014; 152():212-9. PubMed ID: 24291797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term effect on membrane fouling in a new membrane bioreactor as a pretreatment to seawater desalination.
Jeong S; Rice SA; Vigneswaran S
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 165():60-8. PubMed ID: 24745896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of biofilm carriers on membrane fouling propensity in moving biofilm membrane bioreactor.
Jamal Khan S; Zohaib-Ur-Rehman ; Visvanathan C; Jegatheesan V
Bioresour Technol; 2012 Jun; 113():161-4. PubMed ID: 22342044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility study of moving-fiber biofilm membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment: process control.
Phattaranawik J; Leiknes T
Water Res; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2227-34. PubMed ID: 21324506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting filtration characteristics in membrane-coupled moving bed biofilm reactor.
Lee WN; Kang IJ; Lee CH
Water Res; 2006 May; 40(9):1827-35. PubMed ID: 16631228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Real-time monitoring of the membrane biofouling based on spectroscopic analysis in a marine MBBR-MBR (moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor) for saline wastewater treatment.
Yu Z; Li W; Tan S
Chemosphere; 2019 Nov; 235():1154-1161. PubMed ID: 31561306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of colloidal and soluble organic material on membrane performance in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment.
Rosenberger S; Laabs C; Lesjean B; Gnirss R; Amy G; Jekel M; Schrotter JC
Water Res; 2006 Feb; 40(4):710-20. PubMed ID: 16387346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of salinity build-up on biomass characteristics and trace organic chemical removal: implications on the development of high retention membrane bioreactors.
Luo W; Hai FI; Kang J; Price WE; Guo W; Ngo HH; Yamamoto K; Nghiem LD
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Feb; 177():274-81. PubMed ID: 25496948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance and membrane fouling in a pilot scale SBR process coupled with membrane.
Shin H; Kang S
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 12578186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing aeration rates for minimizing membrane fouling and its effect on sludge characteristics in a moving bed membrane bioreactor.
Rahimi Y; Torabian A; Mehrdadi N; Habibi-Rezaie M; Pezeshk H; Nabi-Bidhendi GR
J Hazard Mater; 2011 Feb; 186(2-3):1097-102. PubMed ID: 21168965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fouling potential evaluation of soluble microbial products (SMP) with different membrane surfaces in a hybrid membrane bioreactor using worm reactor for sludge reduction.
Li Z; Tian Y; Ding Y; Chen L; Wang H
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Jul; 140():111-9. PubMed ID: 23685647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
