These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24622929)

  • 21. The influence of learning methods on collaboration: prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory.
    Congleton AR; Rajaram S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):535-51. PubMed ID: 21744986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. No advantage for remembering horizontal over vertical spatial locations learned from a single viewpoint.
    Hinterecker T; Leroy C; Zhao M; Butz MV; Bülthoff HH; Meilinger T
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jan; 46(1):158-171. PubMed ID: 28875474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Collaborative remembering revisited: Study context access modulates collaborative inhibition and later benefits for individual memory.
    Abel M; Bäuml KT
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Nov; 45(8):1319-1334. PubMed ID: 28770540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Integration of visuospatial information encoded from different viewpoints.
    Adamou C; Avraamides MN; Kelly JW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Jun; 21(3):659-65. PubMed ID: 24186271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retrieval practice enhances near but not far transfer of spatial memory.
    Brunyé TT; Smith AM; Hendel D; Gardony AL; Martis SB; Taylor HA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jan; 46(1):24-45. PubMed ID: 30998073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):840-6. PubMed ID: 19882435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Elimination of collaborative inhibition effect using the Method of Loci.
    Saraiva M; Albuquerque PB; Arantes J
    Psicothema; 2016 May; 28(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 27112816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of multiple trials and computer-mediated communication on collaborative and individual semantic recall.
    Hinds JM; Payne SJ
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):415-423. PubMed ID: 28750599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neurocognitive mechanisms of collaborative recall.
    Montoro-Membila N; Maswood R; Molina B; Rajaram S; Bajo T
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2022 Sep; 193():107639. PubMed ID: 35598824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Inhibitory Process of Collaborative Inhibition: Assessment Using an Emotional Stroop Task.
    Zhang H; Zhang X; Liu X; Yang H; Shi J
    Psychol Rep; 2020 Apr; 123(2):300-324. PubMed ID: 30428267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Collaborative remembering reduces suggestibility: A study with the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale.
    Rossi-Arnaud C; Spataro P; Bhatia D; Cestari V
    Memory; 2019 May; 27(5):603-611. PubMed ID: 30384799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Emergence and transmission of misinformation in the context of social interactions.
    Saraiva M; Garrido MV; Albuquerque PB
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jan; 49(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 32789597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does collaboration help or hurt recall? The answer depends on working memory capacity.
    Hood AVB; Whillock SR; Meade ML; Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Mar; 49(3):350-370. PubMed ID: 36006719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Collaboration in implicit memory: evidence from word-fragment completion and category exemplar generation.
    Rossi-Arnaud C; Cestari V; Rezende Silva Marques V; Bechi Gabrielli G; Spataro P
    Psychol Res; 2017 Jan; 81(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 26612200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Compression of environmental representations following interactions with objects.
    Clement A; Radvansky GA; Brockmole JR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Nov; 79(8):2460-2466. PubMed ID: 28828730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Object and place information processing by CA1 hippocampal neurons of C57BL/6J mice.
    Ásgeirsdóttir HN; Cohen SJ; Stackman RW
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Mar; 123(3):1247-1264. PubMed ID: 32023149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The expression of allocentric object-place recognition memory during development.
    Contreras MP; Born J; Inostroza M
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Oct; 372():112013. PubMed ID: 31173799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does retrieval strategy disruption cause general and specific collaborative inhibition?
    Dahlström Ö; Danielsson H; Emilsson M; Andersson J
    Memory; 2011 Feb; 19(2):140-54. PubMed ID: 21331969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Correction of false memory for associated word lists by collaborating groups.
    Weigold A; Russell EJ; Natera SN
    Am J Psychol; 2014; 127(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 24934009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Extrinsic reference frames modify the neural substrates of object-location representations.
    Chan E; Baumann O; Bellgrove MA; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Apr; 51(5):781-8. PubMed ID: 23422330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.