165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24623010)
1. [Phase contrast imaging of the breast. Basic principles and steps towards clinical implementation].
Grandl S; Sztrókay-Gaul A; Auweter SD; Hellerhoff K
Radiologe; 2014 Mar; 54(3):254-61. PubMed ID: 24623010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of exposure equalization on image signal-to-noise ratios in digital mammography: a simulation study with an anthropomorphic breast phantom.
Liu X; Lai CJ; Whitman GJ; Geiser WR; Shen Y; Yi Y; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6489-501. PubMed ID: 22149832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Towards the clinical application of X-ray phase contrast imaging.
Williams IM; Siu KK; Gan R; He X; Hart SA; Styles CB; Lewis RA
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S73-7. PubMed ID: 18996661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of edge effect due to phase contrast imaging for mammography.
Matsuo S; Katafuchi T; Tohyama K; Morishita J; Yamada K; Fujita H
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2690-7. PubMed ID: 16193800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wavelet-based noise-model driven denoising algorithm for differential phase contrast mammography.
Arboleda C; Wang Z; Stampanoni M
Opt Express; 2013 May; 21(9):10572-89. PubMed ID: 23669913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A study on mastectomy samples to evaluate breast imaging quality and potential clinical relevance of differential phase contrast mammography.
Hauser N; Wang Z; Kubik-Huch RA; Trippel M; Singer G; Hohl MK; Roessl E; Köhler T; van Stevendaal U; Wieberneit N; Stampanoni M
Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 24141742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers.
Sadaf A; Crystal P; Scaranelo A; Helbich T
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):457-61. PubMed ID: 19875260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. X-ray phase-contrast imaging of the breast--advances towards clinical implementation.
Auweter SD; Herzen J; Willner M; Grandl S; Scherer K; Bamberg F; Reiser MF; Pfeiffer F; Hellerhoff K
Br J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 87(1034):20130606. PubMed ID: 24452106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital mammography imaging: breast tomosynthesis and advanced applications.
Helvie MA
Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):917-29. PubMed ID: 20868894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
Dromain C; Balleyguier C; Adler G; Garbay JR; Delaloge S
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 18790584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast CT.
Glick SJ
Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2007; 9():501-26. PubMed ID: 17506654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital mammography: an update.
Schulz-Wendtland R; Fuchsjäger M; Wacker T; Hermann KP
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 19592186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Implementation, Performance, and Use for Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening.
Covington MF
Radiol Clin North Am; 2021 Jan; 59(1):113-128. PubMed ID: 33222993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast image pre-processing for mammographic tissue segmentation.
He W; Hogg P; Juette A; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():61-73. PubMed ID: 26498046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An iterative three-dimensional electron density imaging algorithm using uncollimated compton scattered x rays from a polyenergetic primary pencil beam.
Van Uytven E; Pistorius S; Gordon R
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):256-65. PubMed ID: 17278511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. X-ray phase-attenuation duality and phase retrieval.
Wu X; Liu H; Yan A
Opt Lett; 2005 Feb; 30(4):379-81. PubMed ID: 15762434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptation of a clustered lumpy background model for task-based image quality assessment in x-ray phase-contrast mammography.
Zysk AM; Brankov JG; Wernick MN; Anastasio MA
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):906-11. PubMed ID: 22320800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses.
Singh S; Bovis K
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2005 Mar; 9(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 15787013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
