199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24623013)
1. Understanding the reliability of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program as a quality comparator.
Rhoads KF; Wren SM
JAMA Surg; 2014 May; 149(5):474. PubMed ID: 24623013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of risk-adjusted outcomes for profiling hospital surgical quality.
Krell RW; Hozain A; Kao LS; Dimick JB
JAMA Surg; 2014 May; 149(5):467-74. PubMed ID: 24623045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring surgical performance: A risky game?
Kiernan F; Rahman F
Surgeon; 2015 Aug; 13(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 25638721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program With the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database.
Weiss A; Anderson JE; Chang DC
JAMA Surg; 2015 Aug; 150(8):815-6. PubMed ID: 26061977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Does the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program pediatric provide actionable quality improvement data for surgical neonates?
Bucher BT; Duggan EM; Grubb PH; France DJ; Lally KP; Blakely ML
J Pediatr Surg; 2016 Sep; 51(9):1440-4. PubMed ID: 27046303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Sheils CR; Dahlke AR; Kreutzer L; Bilimoria KY; Yang AD
Surgery; 2016 Nov; 160(5):1182-1188. PubMed ID: 27302100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric: a beta phase report.
Bruny JL; Hall BL; Barnhart DC; Billmire DF; Dias MS; Dillon PW; Fisher C; Heiss KF; Hennrikus WL; Ko CY; Moss L; Oldham KT; Richards KE; Shah R; Vinocur CD; Ziegler MM
J Pediatr Surg; 2013 Jan; 48(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 23331796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methodology and analytic rationale for the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program.
Newgard CD; Fildes JJ; Wu L; Hemmila MR; Burd RS; Neal M; Mann NC; Shafi S; Clark DE; Goble S; Nathens AB
J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Jan; 216(1):147-57. PubMed ID: 23062519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative to improve surgical outcomes.
Guillamondegui OD; Gunter OL; Hines L; Martin BJ; Gibson W; Clarke PC; Cecil WT; Cofer JB
J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Apr; 214(4):709-14; discussion 714-6. PubMed ID: 22265639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of mortality risk adjustment using a clinical data algorithm (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) and an administrative data algorithm (Solucient) at the case level within a single institution.
Hall BL; Hirbe M; Waterman B; Boslaugh S; Dunagan WC
J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Dec; 205(6):767-77. PubMed ID: 18035260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus.
Cohen ME; Ko CY; Bilimoria KY; Zhou L; Huffman K; Wang X; Liu Y; Kraemer K; Meng X; Merkow R; Chow W; Matel B; Richards K; Hart AJ; Dimick JB; Hall BL
J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Aug; 217(2):336-46.e1. PubMed ID: 23628227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Risk adjustment in quality comparison - why hierarchical models?].
Richter D
Pflege; 2014 Apr; 27(2):129. PubMed ID: 24670545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A calculator for mortality following emergency general surgery based on the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.
Haskins IN; Maluso PJ; Schroeder ME; Amdur RL; Vaziri K; Agarwal S; Sarani B
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2017 Jun; 82(6):1094-1099. PubMed ID: 28328681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality and Safety in Health Care, Part XVII: The ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Harolds JA
Clin Nucl Med; 2016 Dec; 41(12):933-935. PubMed ID: 27749409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the paediatric surgery patient experience: an 8-year analysis of narrative quality data.
Robillard JM; Bourne SC; Tam MT; Page PM; Lamb EA; Gogal C; Skarsgard ED; Afshar K
BMJ Open Qual; 2020 May; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 32381597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved Surgical Outcomes for ACS NSQIP Hospitals Over Time: Evaluation of Hospital Cohorts With up to 8 Years of Participation.
Cohen ME; Liu Y; Ko CY; Hall BL
Ann Surg; 2016 Feb; 263(2):267-73. PubMed ID: 25723845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of risk adjustment methodologies in surgical quality improvement.
Steinberg SM; Popa MR; Michalek JA; Bethel MJ; Ellison EC
Surgery; 2008 Oct; 144(4):662-7; discussion 662-7. PubMed ID: 18847652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring and achieving the best possible outcomes in surgery.
Clavien PA; Puhan MA
Br J Surg; 2017 Aug; 104(9):1121-1122. PubMed ID: 28488801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Association of surgical care improvement project infection-related process measure compliance with risk-adjusted outcomes: implications for quality measurement.
Ingraham AM; Cohen ME; Bilimoria KY; Dimick JB; Richards KE; Raval MV; Fleisher LA; Hall BL; Ko CY
J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Dec; 211(6):705-14. PubMed ID: 21109157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk adjustment: incorporation of a novel procedure risk score.
Raval MV; Cohen ME; Ingraham AM; Dimick JB; Osborne NH; Hamilton BH; Ko CY; Hall BL
J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Dec; 211(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 20846884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
