135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24624270)
1. A comparison of supraglottic airway i-gel™ vs. classic laryngeal mask airway in small children.
Lee JH; Cho HS; Shin WJ; Yang HS
Korean J Anesthesiol; 2014 Feb; 66(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 24624270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of i-gel™ supraglottic device with classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed children undergoing elective surgery.
Das B; Mitra S; Samanta A; Vijay BS
Anesth Essays Res; 2012; 6(2):180-3. PubMed ID: 25885613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
Damodaran S; Sethi S; Malhotra SK; Samra T; Maitra S; Saini V
Saudi J Anaesth; 2017; 11(4):390-395. PubMed ID: 29033717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fiberoptic intubation of severely obese patients through supraglottic airway: A prospective, randomized trial of the Ambu
Moser B; Keller C; Audigé L; Dave MH; Bruppacher HR
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2019 Feb; 63(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 30088266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients.
Shin WJ; Cheong YS; Yang HS; Nishiyama T
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):598-601. PubMed ID: 19915475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomised trial to compare i-gel and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway for airway management in paediatric patients.
Nirupa R; Gombar S; Ahuja V; Sharma P
Indian J Anaesth; 2016 Oct; 60(10):726-731. PubMed ID: 27761035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of i-gel™ and laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed patients.
Reza Hashemian SM; Nouraei N; Razavi SS; Zaker E; Jafari A; Eftekhari P; Radmand G; Mohajerani SA; Radpay B
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci; 2014; 4(4):288-92. PubMed ID: 25625059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the i-gel™ with the AuraGain™ laryngeal mask airways in patients with a simulated cervical immobilization: a randomized controlled trial.
Hur M; Choi S; Row HS; Kim TK
Minerva Anestesiol; 2020 Jul; 86(7):727-735. PubMed ID: 32251570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of the i-gel™ and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic™ in terms of clinical performance].
Polat R; Aydin GB; Ergil J; Sayin M; Kokulu T; Öztürk İ
Rev Bras Anestesiol; 2015; 65(5):343-8. PubMed ID: 26363690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of airway dynamics in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation using ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, I-Gel™ and Baska mask.
Kumar B; Gupta B; Thakur A; Rana S; Garg M; Nehria M
Indian J Anaesth; 2022 Dec; 66(12):842-848. PubMed ID: 36654901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of Success and Ease of Insertion of ProSeal™ Laryngeal Mask Airway versus I-gel™ Insertion by Paramedics in Simulated Difficult Airway Using Cervical Collar in Different Positions in Manikins.
Gupta A; Kabi A; Gaur D
Anesth Essays Res; 2020; 14(4):627-631. PubMed ID: 34349332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the i-gel™ and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic™ in terms of clinical performance.
Polat R; Aydin GB; Ergil J; Sayin M; Kokulu T; Öztürk İ
Braz J Anesthesiol; 2015; 65(5):343-8. PubMed ID: 26323731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of size 2 i-gel supraglottic airway with LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Classic™ in spontaneously breathing children undergoing elective surgery.
Goyal R; Shukla RN; Kumar G
Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Apr; 22(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 22151106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of three supraglottic devices in anesthetised paralyzed children undergoing elective surgery.
Das B; Mitra S; Jamil SN; Varshney RK
Saudi J Anaesth; 2012 Jul; 6(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 23162394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of i-gel™ and laryngeal mask airway Classic™ in terms of ease of insertion and hemodynamic response: A randomized observational study.
Pratheeba N; Ramya GS; Ranjan RV; Remadevi R
Anesth Essays Res; 2016; 10(3):521-525. PubMed ID: 27746545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of I-Gel™ versus Classic LMA™ for Airway Management by Paramedics and Medical Students: A Manikin Study.
Kannaujia AK; Srivastava U; Singh T; Haldar R
Anesth Essays Res; 2020; 14(1):166-169. PubMed ID: 32843812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomised controlled trial comparing ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, i-gel and Laryngeal Tube Suction-D under general anaesthesia for elective surgical patients requiring controlled ventilation.
Das B; Varshney R; Mitra S
Indian J Anaesth; 2017 Dec; 61(12):972-977. PubMed ID: 29307902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Size 2.5 i-gel™ with Proseal LMA™ in Anaesthetised, Paralyzed Children Undergoing Elective Surgery.
Mitra S; Das B; Jamil SN
N Am J Med Sci; 2012 Oct; 4(10):453-7. PubMed ID: 23112965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective, randomized comparison of the LMA-protector™ and i-gel™ in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
Chang JE; Kim H; Lee JM; Min SW; Won D; Jun K; Hwang JY
BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):118. PubMed ID: 31272379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the I-Gel™ in the different head-and-neck positions in anaesthetised paralysed children: A randomised controlled trial.
Banerjee G; Jain D; Bala I; Gandhi K; Samujh R
Indian J Anaesth; 2018 Feb; 62(2):103-108. PubMed ID: 29491514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
