These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24625081)

  • 1. Pre-site characterization risk analysis for commercial-scale carbon sequestration.
    Dai Z; Stauffer PH; Carey JW; Middleton RS; Lu Z; Jacobs JF; Hnottavange-Telleen K; Spangler LH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Apr; 48(7):3908-15. PubMed ID: 24625081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probabilistic evaluation of shallow groundwater resources at a hypothetical carbon sequestration site.
    Dai Z; Keating E; Bacon D; Viswanathan H; Stauffer P; Jordan A; Pawar R
    Sci Rep; 2014 Mar; 4():4006. PubMed ID: 24844225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CO2 Accounting and Risk Analysis for CO2 Sequestration at Enhanced Oil Recovery Sites.
    Dai Z; Viswanathan H; Middleton R; Pan F; Ampomah W; Yang C; Jia W; Xiao T; Lee SY; McPherson B; Balch R; Grigg R; White M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 50(14):7546-54. PubMed ID: 27362472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantifying the benefit of wellbore leakage potential estimates for prioritizing long-term MVA well sampling at a CO2 storage site.
    Azzolina NA; Small MJ; Nakles DV; Glazewski KA; Peck WD; Gorecki CD; Bromhal GS; Dilmore RM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jan; 49(2):1215-24. PubMed ID: 25551254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Framework for the assessment of interaction between CO2 geological storage and other sedimentary basin resources.
    Michael K; Whittaker S; Varma S; Bekele E; Langhi L; Hodgkinson J; Harris B
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2016 Feb; 18(2):164-75. PubMed ID: 26767550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of Maximum Allowable Cost on CO2 Storage Capacity in Saline Formations.
    Mathias SA; Gluyas JG; Goldthorpe WH; Mackay EJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Nov; 49(22):13510-8. PubMed ID: 26480926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity thresholds of groundwater parameters for detecting CO
    Berger PM; Wimmer B; Iranmanesh A
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Oct; 191(11):685. PubMed ID: 31659477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probabilistic design of a near-surface CO2 leak detection system.
    Yang YM; Small MJ; Ogretim EO; Gray DD; Bromhal GS; Strazisar BR; Wells AW
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Aug; 45(15):6380-7. PubMed ID: 21732603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing risk in basin scale CO2 sequestration: a framework for integrated monitoring design.
    Seto CJ; McRae GJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Feb; 45(3):845-59. PubMed ID: 21218768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved Vinegar & Wellington calibration for estimation of fluid saturation and porosity from CT images for a core flooding test under geologic carbon storage conditions.
    Miao X; Wang Y; Zhang L; Wei N; Li X
    Micron; 2019 Sep; 124():102703. PubMed ID: 31284162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigation of an Indian Site with Mafic Rock for Carbon Sequestration.
    Saif M; Kiran R; Rajak VK; Verma RK
    ACS Omega; 2024 Jul; 9(28):30270-30280. PubMed ID: 39035916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative permeability experiments of carbon dioxide displacing brine and their implications for carbon sequestration.
    Levine JS; Goldberg DS; Lackner KS; Matter JM; Supp MG; Ramakrishnan TS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(1):811-8. PubMed ID: 24274391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial stochastic modeling of sedimentary formations to assess CO2 storage potential.
    Popova OH; Small MJ; McCoy ST; Thomas AC; Rose S; Karimi B; Carter K; Goodman A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jun; 48(11):6247-55. PubMed ID: 24824160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiphase modeling of geologic carbon sequestration in saline aquifers.
    Bandilla KW; Celia MA; Birkholzer JT; Cihan A; Leister EC
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(3):362-77. PubMed ID: 25662534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Nanoscale Basis of CO2 Trapping for Geologic Storage.
    Bourg IC; Beckingham LE; DePaolo DJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Sep; 49(17):10265-84. PubMed ID: 26266820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health risk assessments of exposure carbon dioxide among communities and children around Tonasa cement plant, Pangkep Regency, Indonesia. Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) application.
    Mallongi A; Ernyasih E
    Braz J Biol; 2023; 83():e271436. PubMed ID: 37792746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. U-tube based near-surface environmental monitoring in the Shenhua carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) project.
    Li Q; Song R; Shi H; Ma J; Liu X; Li X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Apr; 25(12):12034-12052. PubMed ID: 29453717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reactivity of Mount Simon sandstone and the Eau Claire shale under CO2 storage conditions.
    Carroll SA; McNab WW; Dai Z; Torres SC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(1):252-61. PubMed ID: 22873684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiwell CO2 injectivity: impact of boundary conditions and brine extraction on geologic CO2 storage efficiency and pressure buildup.
    Heath JE; McKenna SA; Dewers TA; Roach JD; Kobos PH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jan; 48(2):1067-74. PubMed ID: 23971876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Program Validation Phase.
    Litynski JT; Plasynski S; McIlvried HG; Mahoney C; Srivastava RD
    Environ Int; 2008 Jan; 34(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 17950875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.