228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24625221)
1. Independent absorbed-dose calculation using the Monte Carlo algorithm in volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Haga A; Magome T; Takenaka S; Imae T; Sakumi A; Nomoto A; Igaki H; Shiraishi K; Yamashita H; Ohtomo K; Nakagawa K
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Mar; 9():75. PubMed ID: 24625221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The commissioning and validation of Monaco treatment planning system on an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator.
Snyder JE; Hyer DE; Flynn RT; Boczkowski A; Wang D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):184-193. PubMed ID: 30525308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Basic Research on Comparative Evaluation of Calculated Dose Distribution Using Monte Carlo Algorithm-equipped Treatment Planning Systems in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy].
Toyota M; Oku Y; Saigo Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(8):795-804. PubMed ID: 34421067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental evaluation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm in the Monaco treatment planning system.
Paudel MR; Kim A; Sarfehnia A; Ahmad SB; Beachey DJ; Sahgal A; Keller BM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):230-241. PubMed ID: 27929496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of direct clinical consequences of MLC positional errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using 3D dosimetry system.
Nithiyanantham K; Mani GK; Subramani V; Mueller L; Palaniappan KK; Kataria T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):296–305. PubMed ID: 26699311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue heterogeneities corrections in the treatment of head and neck cancer patients using stereotactic radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; McClinton C; Sood S; Badkul R; Saleh H; Jiang H; Lominska C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):258-270. PubMed ID: 27074489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. VMAT Optimization and Dose Calculation in the Presence of Metallic Hip Prostheses.
Parenica HM; Mavroidis P; Jones W; Swanson G; Papanikolaou N; Stathakis S
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2019; 18():1533033819892255. PubMed ID: 31789113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Secondary monitor unit calculations for VMAT using parallelized Monte Carlo simulations.
Bhagroo S; French SB; Mathews JA; Nazareth DP
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):60-69. PubMed ID: 31127699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical comparison of dose calculation using the enhanced collapsed cone algorithm vs. a new Monte Carlo algorithm.
Fotina I; Kragl G; Kroupa B; Trausmuth R; Georg D
Strahlenther Onkol; 2011 Jul; 187(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 21713394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment planning dose accuracy improvement in the presence of dental implants.
Parenica HM; Ford JR; Mavroidis P; Li Y; Papanikolaou N; Stathakis S
Med Dosim; 2019 Summer; 44(2):159-166. PubMed ID: 29776851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between two treatment planning systems for volumetric modulated arc therapy optimization for prostate cancer.
Lafond C; Gassa F; Odin C; Dréan G; Even J; De Crevoisier R; Pommier P; Manens JP; Biston MC
Phys Med; 2014 Feb; 30(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 23116552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ARCHERRT - a GPU-based and photon-electron coupled Monte Carlo dose computing engine for radiation therapy: software development and application to helical tomotherapy.
Su L; Yang Y; Bednarz B; Sterpin E; Du X; Liu T; Ji W; Xu XG
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071709. PubMed ID: 24989378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficiency of biological versus physical optimization for single-arc VMAT for prostate and head and neck cases.
Pyshniak V; Fotina I; Zverava A; Siamkouski S; Zayats E; Kopanitsa G; Okuntsau D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):4514. PubMed ID: 25207394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement comparison and Monte Carlo analysis for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery verification using the ArcCHECK dosimetry system.
Lin MH; Koren S; Veltchev I; Li J; Wang L; Price RA; Ma CM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(2):3929. PubMed ID: 23470927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative evaluation of 3D dosimetry for stereotactic volumetric-modulated arc delivery using COMPASS.
Vikraman S; Manigandan D; Karrthick KP; Sambasivaselli R; Senniandavar V; Ramu M; Rajesh T; Lutz M; Muthukumaran M; Karthikeyan N; Tejinder K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 16(1):5128. PubMed ID: 25679152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric effects of a repositioning head frame system and treatment planning system dose calculation accuracy.
Ferrer C; Huertas C; Plaza R; Aza Z; Corredoira E
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):124-132. PubMed ID: 30255659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dependence of volume dose indices on dose calculation algorithms for VMAT-SBRT plans for peripheral lung tumor.
Matsuoka T; Araki F; Ohno T; Sakata J; Tominaga H
Med Dosim; 2019 Autumn; 44(3):284-290. PubMed ID: 30455092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
