These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24626289)

  • 1. Genetic diversity analysis of highly incomplete SNP genotype data with imputations: an empirical assessment.
    Fu YB
    G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Mar; 4(5):891-900. PubMed ID: 24626289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imputation of unordered markers and the impact on genomic selection accuracy.
    Rutkoski JE; Poland J; Jannink JL; Sorrells ME
    G3 (Bethesda); 2013 Mar; 3(3):427-39. PubMed ID: 23449944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low-depth genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) in a bovine population: strategies to maximize the selection of high quality genotypes and the accuracy of imputation.
    Brouard JS; Boyle B; Ibeagha-Awemu EM; Bissonnette N
    BMC Genet; 2017 Apr; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 28381212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating Imputation Algorithms for Low-Depth Genotyping-By-Sequencing (GBS) Data.
    Chan AW; Hamblin MT; Jannink JL
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160733. PubMed ID: 27537694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scanning and Filling: Ultra-Dense SNP Genotyping Combining Genotyping-By-Sequencing, SNP Array and Whole-Genome Resequencing Data.
    Torkamaneh D; Belzile F
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131533. PubMed ID: 26161900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of marker ascertainment bias on genomic selection accuracy and estimates of genetic diversity.
    Heslot N; Rutkoski J; Poland J; Jannink JL; Sorrells ME
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74612. PubMed ID: 24040295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imputation accuracy of wheat genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) data using barley and wheat genome references.
    Alipour H; Bai G; Zhang G; Bihamta MR; Mohammadi V; Peyghambari SA
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0208614. PubMed ID: 30615624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Whole-genome characterization in pedigreed non-human primates using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) and imputation.
    Bimber BN; Raboin MJ; Letaw J; Nevonen KA; Spindel JE; McCouch SR; Cervera-Juanes R; Spindel E; Carbone L; Ferguson B; Vinson A
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):676. PubMed ID: 27558348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of the Wheat Practical Haplotype Graph database as a resource for genotyping data storage and genotype imputation.
    Jordan KW; Bradbury PJ; Miller ZR; Nyine M; He F; Fraser M; Anderson J; Mason E; Katz A; Pearce S; Carter AH; Prather S; Pumphrey M; Chen J; Cook J; Liu S; Rudd JC; Wang Z; Chu C; Ibrahim AMH; Turkus J; Olson E; Nagarajan R; Carver B; Yan L; Taagen E; Sorrells M; Ward B; Ren J; Akhunova A; Bai G; Bowden R; Fiedler J; Faris J; Dubcovsky J; Guttieri M; Brown-Guedira G; Buckler E; Jannink JL; Akhunov ED
    G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 34751373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of Population Sequencing (POPSEQ) for Ordering and Imputing Genotyping-by-Sequencing Markers in Hexaploid Wheat.
    Edae EA; Bowden RL; Poland J
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Nov; 5(12):2547-53. PubMed ID: 26530417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phased Genotyping-by-Sequencing Enhances Analysis of Genetic Diversity and Reveals Divergent Copy Number Variants in Maize.
    Manching H; Sengupta S; Hopper KR; Polson SW; Ji Y; Wisser RJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Jul; 7(7):2161-2170. PubMed ID: 28526729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparisons of improved genomic predictions generated by different imputation methods for genotyping by sequencing data in livestock populations.
    Wang X; Su G; Hao D; Lund MS; Kadarmideen HN
    J Anim Sci Biotechnol; 2020; 11():3. PubMed ID: 31921417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Saturated linkage map construction in Rubus idaeus using genotyping by sequencing and genome-independent imputation.
    Ward JA; Bhangoo J; Fernández-Fernández F; Moore P; Swanson JD; Viola R; Velasco R; Bassil N; Weber CA; Sargent DJ
    BMC Genomics; 2013 Jan; 14():2. PubMed ID: 23324311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic prediction in maize breeding populations with genotyping-by-sequencing.
    Crossa J; Beyene Y; Kassa S; Pérez P; Hickey JM; Chen C; de los Campos G; Burgueño J; Windhausen VS; Buckler E; Jannink JL; Lopez Cruz MA; Babu R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2013 Nov; 3(11):1903-26. PubMed ID: 24022750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison among three variant callers and assessment of the accuracy of imputation from SNP array data to whole-genome sequence level in chicken.
    Ni G; Strom TM; Pausch H; Reimer C; Preisinger R; Simianer H; Erbe M
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():824. PubMed ID: 26486989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of imputation methods on the amount of genetic variation captured by a single-nucleotide polymorphism panel in soybeans.
    Xavier A; Muir WM; Rainey KM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 17():55. PubMed ID: 26830693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applications of genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) in maize genetics and breeding.
    Wang N; Yuan Y; Wang H; Yu D; Liu Y; Zhang A; Gowda M; Nair SK; Hao Z; Lu Y; San Vicente F; Prasanna BM; Li X; Zhang X
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16308. PubMed ID: 33004874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ascertainment bias from imputation methods evaluation in wheat.
    Brandariz SP; González Reymúndez A; Lado B; Malosetti M; Garcia AA; Quincke M; von Zitzewitz J; Castro M; Matus I; Del Pozo A; Castro AJ; Gutiérrez L
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):773. PubMed ID: 27716058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imputation of genotypes from low density (50,000 markers) to high density (700,000 markers) of cows from research herds in Europe, North America, and Australasia using 2 reference populations.
    Pryce JE; Johnston J; Hayes BJ; Sahana G; Weigel KA; McParland S; Spurlock D; Krattenmacher N; Spelman RJ; Wall E; Calus MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1799-811. PubMed ID: 24472132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The hazards of genotype imputation in chromosomal regions under selection: A case study using the Lactase gene region.
    Ali AT; Liebert A; Lau W; Maniatis N; Swallow DM
    Ann Hum Genet; 2022 Jan; 86(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 34523124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.