BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24627010)

  • 1. Bias of using odds ratio estimates in multinomial logistic regressions to estimate relative risk or prevalence ratio and alternatives.
    Camey SA; Torman VB; Hirakata VN; Cortes RX; Vigo A
    Cad Saude Publica; 2014 Jan; 30(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 24627010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The log multinomial regression model for nominal outcomes with more than two attributes.
    Blizzard L; Hosmer DW
    Biom J; 2007 Dec; 49(6):889-902. PubMed ID: 17849384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methods for estimating prevalence ratios in cross-sectional studies.
    Coutinho LM; Scazufca M; Menezes PR
    Rev Saude Publica; 2008 Dec; 42(6):992-8. PubMed ID: 19009156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio.
    Barros AJ; Hirakata VN
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Oct; 3():21. PubMed ID: 14567763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Odds Ratio or Prevalence Ratio? An Overview of Reported Statistical Methods and Appropriateness of Interpretations in Cross-sectional Studies with Dichotomous Outcomes in Veterinary Medicine.
    Martinez BAF; Leotti VB; Silva GSE; Nunes LN; Machado G; Corbellini LG
    Front Vet Sci; 2017; 4():193. PubMed ID: 29177157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Negative log-binomial model with optimal robust variance to estimate the prevalence ratio, in cross-sectional population studies.
    Ibáñez-Pinilla M; Villalba-Niño S; Olaya-Galán NN
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Oct; 23(1):219. PubMed ID: 37794385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian models as a unified approach to estimate relative risk (or prevalence ratio) in binary and polytomous outcomes.
    Torman VB; Camey SA
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2015; 12():8. PubMed ID: 26097494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Obtaining adjusted prevalence ratios from logistic regression models in cross-sectional studies.
    Bastos LS; Oliveira Rde V; Velasque Lde S
    Cad Saude Publica; 2015 Mar; 31(3):487-95. PubMed ID: 25859716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating the Source of a Disease Outbreak Based on Risk Estimation: A Simulation Study Comparing Risk Estimates Obtained From Logistic and Poisson Regression Applied to a Dichotomous Outcome.
    Rojanaworarit C; Wong JJ
    Ochsner J; 2019; 19(3):220-226. PubMed ID: 31528132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of relative risk and prevalence ratio.
    Savu A; Liu Q; Yasui Y
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(22):2269-81. PubMed ID: 20564738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Odds ratios from logistic, geometric, Poisson, and negative binomial regression models.
    Sroka CJ; Nagaraja HN
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):112. PubMed ID: 30342488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simple method for estimating relative risk using logistic regression.
    Diaz-Quijano FA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Feb; 12():14. PubMed ID: 22335836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Different methods to calculate effect estimates in cross-sectional studies. A comparison between prevalence odds ratio and prevalence ratio.
    Behrens T; Taeger D; Wellmann J; Keil U
    Methods Inf Med; 2004; 43(5):505-9. PubMed ID: 15702210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Selection of statistical methods for estimating the association between exposure factors and rare outcomes based on cohort studies].
    Liu XH; Wang C; Yan RH; Peng XX; Yin CH
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jul; 44(7):1126-1132. PubMed ID: 37482717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical Issues in Estimation of Adjusted Risk Ratio in Prospective Studies.
    Janani L; Mansournia MA; Nourijeylani K; Mahmoodi M; Mohammad K
    Arch Iran Med; 2015 Oct; 18(10):713-9. PubMed ID: 26443254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correction of logistic regression relative risk estimates and confidence intervals for systematic within-person measurement error.
    Rosner B; Willett WC; Spiegelman D
    Stat Med; 1989 Sep; 8(9):1051-69; discussion 1071-3. PubMed ID: 2799131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standardized binomial models for risk or prevalence ratios and differences.
    Richardson DB; Kinlaw AC; MacLehose RF; Cole SR
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 44(5):1660-72. PubMed ID: 26228585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Logistic regression vs other generalized linear models to estimate prevalence rate ratios].
    Traissac P; Martin-Prével Y; Delpeuch F; Maire B
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Dec; 47(6):593-604. PubMed ID: 10673593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating risk ratio from any standard epidemiological design by doubling the cases.
    Ning Y; Lam A; Reilly M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 May; 22(1):157. PubMed ID: 35637431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating relative risk of disease from outputs of logistic regression when the disease is not rare.
    Beaudeau F; Fourichon C
    Prev Vet Med; 1998 Oct; 36(4):243-56. PubMed ID: 9820886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.