These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24627211)

  • 1. Attention meets binding: only attended distractors are used for the retrieval of event files.
    Moeller B; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):959-78. PubMed ID: 24627211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distractor-based retrieval in action control: the influence of encoding specificity.
    Laub R; Frings C
    Psychol Res; 2020 Apr; 84(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 30173278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distractor-based stimulus-response bindings retrieve decisions independent of motor programs.
    Nett N; Bröder A; Frings C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Nov; 171():57-64. PubMed ID: 27665268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. To be or not to be...included in an event file: integration and retrieval of distractors in stimulus-response episodes is influenced by perceptual grouping.
    Frings C; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1209-27. PubMed ID: 21707218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integrating the irrelevant sound.
    Moeller B; Rothermund K; Frings C
    Exp Psychol; 2012 Jan; 59(5):258-64. PubMed ID: 22580408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Not all errors are created equally: specific ERN responses for errors originating from distractor-based response retrieval.
    Wiswede D; Rothermund K; Frings C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2013 Nov; 38(10):3496-506. PubMed ID: 23961772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrieval of event files can be conceptually mediated.
    Frings C; Moeller B; Rothermund K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 May; 75(4):700-9. PubMed ID: 23392625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the neural mechanisms underlying the protective function of retroactive cuing against perceptual interference: Evidence by event-related potentials of the EEG.
    Schneider D; Barth A; Getzmann S; Wascher E
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Mar; 124():47-56. PubMed ID: 28115199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distractor-induced blindness for orientation changes and coherent motion.
    Michael L; Hesselmann G; Kiefer M; Niedeggen M
    Vision Res; 2011 Aug; 51(15):1781-7. PubMed ID: 21703293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distractor-relevance determines whether task-switching enhances or impairs distractor memory.
    Chiu YC; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jan; 42(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26594883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When irrelevance matters: Stimulus-response binding in decision making under uncertainty.
    Nett N; Bröder A; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1831-48. PubMed ID: 26076329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strategic control over extent and timing of distractor-based response activation.
    Jost K; Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Löw A; Jacobsen T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Feb; 43(2):326-333. PubMed ID: 27732019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The search for oculomotor inhibition: interactions with working memory.
    Van der Stigchel S
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(6):429-35. PubMed ID: 20178939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of spatial response coding on distractor processing: evidence from auditory spatial negative priming tasks with keypress, joystick, and head movement responses.
    Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):293-310. PubMed ID: 25214304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the robustness of prime response retrieval processes: evidence from auditory negative priming without probe interference.
    Mayr S; Buchner A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Feb; 67(2):335-57. PubMed ID: 23799324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binding targets' responses to distractors' locations: distractor response bindings in a location-priming task.
    Frings C; Möller B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2176-83. PubMed ID: 21097861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.
    Lange K; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The level of representation of irrelevant stimuli-Distractor-response binding within and between the senses.
    Laub R; Merz S; Dröschel H; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):2256-2266. PubMed ID: 33768482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. May I have your attention please: Binding of attended but response-irrelevant features.
    Singh T; Moeller B; Koch I; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1143-1156. PubMed ID: 29520713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.