These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24627213)

  • 21. Limited capacity for memory tasks with multiple features within a single object.
    Palmer J; Boston B; Moore CM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1488-99. PubMed ID: 25939700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The role of stimulus type in age-related changes of visual working memory.
    Leonards U; Ibanez V; Giannakopoulos P
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Sep; 146(2):172-83. PubMed ID: 12195519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. To the trained eye: perceptual expertise alters visual processing.
    Curby KM; Gauthier I
    Top Cogn Sci; 2010 Apr; 2(2):189-201. PubMed ID: 25163783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of non-visual working memory load on top-down modulation of visual processing.
    Rissman J; Gazzaley A; D'Esposito M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jun; 47(7):1637-46. PubMed ID: 19397858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The role of experience-based perceptual learning in the face inversion effect.
    Civile C; Obhi SS; McLaren IPL
    Vision Res; 2019 Apr; 157():84-88. PubMed ID: 29608937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accounting for stimulus-specific variation in precision reveals a discrete capacity limit in visual working memory.
    Pratte MS; Park YE; Rademaker RL; Tong F
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jan; 43(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 28004957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Discrimination of faces and houses by rhesus monkeys: the role of stimulus expertise and rotation angle.
    Parr LA; Heintz M
    Anim Cogn; 2008 Jul; 11(3):467-74. PubMed ID: 18256863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification.
    Gaspar C; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Dec; 48(28):2817-26. PubMed ID: 18835403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Distraction biases working memory for faces.
    Mallett R; Mummaneni A; Lewis-Peacock JA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Apr; 27(2):350-356. PubMed ID: 31907852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dissociable cortical pathways for qualitative and quantitative mechanisms in the face inversion effect.
    Matsuyoshi D; Morita T; Kochiyama T; Tanabe HC; Sadato N; Kakigi R
    J Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 35(10):4268-79. PubMed ID: 25762673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Coarse-to-fine encoding of spatial frequency information into visual short-term memory for faces but impartial decay.
    Gao Z; Bentin S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1051-64. PubMed ID: 21500938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing.
    Sekuler AB; Gaspar CM; Gold JM; Bennett PJ
    Curr Biol; 2004 Mar; 14(5):391-6. PubMed ID: 15028214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual working memory for letters varies with familiarity but not complexity.
    Ngiam WXQ; Khaw KLC; Holcombe AO; Goodbourn PT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1761-1775. PubMed ID: 30589333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Rapid Forgetting of Faces.
    Krill D; Avidan G; Pertzov Y
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1319. PubMed ID: 30100894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Implicit face prototype learning from geometric information.
    Or CC; Wilson HR
    Vision Res; 2013 Apr; 82():1-12. PubMed ID: 23416870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The fidelity of visual memory for faces and non-face objects.
    Caudek C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 May; 143(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 23500113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Critical frequencies in the perception of letters, faces, and novel shapes: evidence for limited scale invariance for faces.
    Oruç I; Barton JJ
    J Vis; 2010 Oct; 10(12):20. PubMed ID: 21047752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inversion Impairs Expert Budgerigar Identity Recognition: A Face-Like Effect for a Nonface Object of Expertise.
    Campbell A; Tanaka JW
    Perception; 2018 Jun; 47(6):647-659. PubMed ID: 29690836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Real-world spatial regularities affect visual working memory for objects.
    Kaiser D; Stein T; Peelen MV
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1784-90. PubMed ID: 25896215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.