These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States. Paciorek CJ; Liu Y; Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recent advances in multiscale CFD modelling of cooling processes and systems for the agrifood industry. Ajani CK; Zhu Z; Sun DW Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2021; 61(15):2455-2470. PubMed ID: 32880478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the importance of diffusion and compound-specific mixing for groundwater transport: an investigation from pore to field scale. Rolle M; Chiogna G; Hochstetler DL; Kitanidis PK J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Oct; 153():51-68. PubMed ID: 23994908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modeling field-scale multiple tracer injection at a low-level waste disposal site in fractured rocks: effect of multiscale heterogeneity and source term uncertainty on conceptual understanding of mass transfer processes. Gwo JP; Jardine PM; Sanford WE J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Mar; 77(1-2):91-118. PubMed ID: 15722174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of site conditions for disposal of low- and intermediate-level radioactive wastes: a case study in southern China. Yi S; Ma H; Zheng C; Zhu X; Wang H; Li X; Hu X; Qin J Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jan; 414():624-31. PubMed ID: 22119030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identifying key controls on the behavior of an acidic-U(VI) plume in the Savannah River Site using reactive transport modeling. Bea SA; Wainwright H; Spycher N; Faybishenko B; Hubbard SS; Denham ME J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Aug; 151():34-54. PubMed ID: 23707874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identification of groundwater parameters using an adaptative multiscale method. Majdalani S; Ackerer P Ground Water; 2011; 49(4):548-59. PubMed ID: 20849419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Theory meets Industry (Erwin-Schrödinger-Institute (ESI), Vienna, Austria, 12-14 June 2007). Hafner J J Phys Condens Matter; 2008 Feb; 20(6):060301. PubMed ID: 21693862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using hydrochemical data and modelling to enhance the knowledge of groundwater flow and quality in an alluvial aquifer of Zagreb, Croatia. Marković T; Brkić Ž; Larva O Sci Total Environ; 2013 Aug; 458-460():508-16. PubMed ID: 23707721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reducing uncertainty in calibrating aquifer flow model with multiple scales of heterogeneity. Zhang Y Ground Water; 2014; 52(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 24749908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reaction capacity characterization of shallow sedimentary deposits in geologically different regions of the Netherlands. Griffioen J; Klein J; van Gaans PF J Contam Hydrol; 2012 Jan; 127(1-4):30-46. PubMed ID: 21549444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the MODFLOW-2005 Conduit Flow Process. Hill ME; Stewart MT; Martin A Ground Water; 2010; 48(4):549-59. PubMed ID: 20113361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiscale modeling of soft matter: scaling of dynamics. Fritz D; Koschke K; Harmandaris VA; van der Vegt NF; Kremer K Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2011 Jun; 13(22):10412-20. PubMed ID: 21468407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-Resolution Modeling of Dense Drainage Networks in Confining Layers. Pauw PS; Van der Zee SE; Leijnse A; Delsman JR; De Louw PG; De Lange WJ; Oude Essink GH Ground Water; 2015; 53(5):771-81. PubMed ID: 25250661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regional Groundwater Flow in the Louisville Aquifer. Tiaif S; Serrano SE Ground Water; 2015; 53(4):550-7. PubMed ID: 25070643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modeling of strategies for performance monitoring of groundwater contamination at sites underlain by fractured bedrock. Chen Y; Smith L; Beckie R J Contam Hydrol; 2012 Jun; 134-135():37-53. PubMed ID: 22579666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An assessment of aquifer storage recovery using ground water flow models. Lowry CS; Anderson MP Ground Water; 2006; 44(5):661-7. PubMed ID: 16961487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parallel Processing Transport Model MT3DMS by Using OpenMP. Huang L; Wang L; Shao J; Liu X; Hao Q; Xing L; Zheng L; Xiao Y Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 May; 15(6):. PubMed ID: 29794989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Studying the flow dynamics of a karst aquifer system with an equivalent porous medium model. Abusaada M; Sauter M Ground Water; 2013; 51(4):641-50. PubMed ID: 23039080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]