These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24628718)

  • 21. Impairment of source memory in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: equivalent current dipole analysis.
    Kim YY; Roh AY; Yoo SY; Kang DH; Kwon JS
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Jan; 165(1-2):47-59. PubMed ID: 19027963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Overt attention and predictiveness in human contingency learning.
    Le Pelley ME; Beesley T; Griffiths O
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 21319915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Remedying the Metamemory Expectancy Illusion in Source Monitoring: Are there Effects on Restudy Choices and Source Memory?
    Schaper ML; Bayen UJ; Hey CV
    Metacogn Learn; 2023; 18(1):55-80. PubMed ID: 35968027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A multiprocess account of hindsight bias in children.
    Pohl RF; Bayen UJ; Martin C
    Dev Psychol; 2010 Sep; 46(5):1268-82. PubMed ID: 20822237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Isolating metamemory deficits in the self-regulated learning of adults with ADHD.
    Knouse LE; Anastopoulos AD; Dunlosky J
    J Atten Disord; 2012 Nov; 16(8):650-60. PubMed ID: 22094857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Memory for schema-relevant information: a meta-analytic resolution.
    Rojahn K; Pettigrew TF
    Br J Soc Psychol; 1992 Jun; 31 ( Pt 2)():81-109. PubMed ID: 1535823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Memory and metamemory for social interactions: Evidence for a metamemory expectancy illusion.
    Mieth L; Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bell R
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jan; 49(1):14-31. PubMed ID: 32734524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Remembering source evidence from associatively related items: explanations from a global matching model.
    Hicks JL; Starns JJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1164-73. PubMed ID: 16938053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adaptive memory: enhanced source memory for animate entities.
    Mieth L; Röer JP; Buchner A; Bell R
    Memory; 2019 Sep; 27(8):1034-1042. PubMed ID: 31092148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. When is schematic knowledge used in source monitoring?
    Spaniol J; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):631-51. PubMed ID: 12109758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Age and response bias: evidence from the strength-based mirror effect.
    Criss AH; Aue W; Kılıç A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):1910-24. PubMed ID: 24386987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Delaying metamemory judgments corrects the expectancy illusion in source monitoring: The role of fluency and belief.
    Schaper ML; Bayen UJ; Hey CV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jul; 48(7):975-1000. PubMed ID: 34726439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The impact of age stereotypes on source monitoring in younger and older adults.
    Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ; Meuser K; Kornadt AE
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Dec; 31(8):875-889. PubMed ID: 27831724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Increased or reversed? The effect of surprise on hindsight bias depends on the hindsight component.
    Nestler S; Egloff B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1539-44. PubMed ID: 19857022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Generation difficulty and memory for source.
    Nieznański M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1593-608. PubMed ID: 21553355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fluent, fast, and frugal? A formal model evaluation of the interplay between memory, fluency, and comparative judgments.
    Hilbig BE; Erdfelder E; Pohl RF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):827-39. PubMed ID: 21355665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Distinctive items are salient during encoding: delayed judgements of learning predict the isolation effect.
    Geraci L; Manzano I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 19370485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Unequal-strength source zROC slopes reflect criteria placement and not (necessarily) memory processes.
    Starns JJ; Pazzaglia AM; Rotello CM; Hautus MJ; Macmillan NA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1377-92. PubMed ID: 23565789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Remember-Know and source memory instructions can qualitatively change old-new recognition accuracy: the modality-match effect in recognition memory.
    Mulligan NW; Besken M; Peterson D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):558-66. PubMed ID: 20192551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Simple predictions fueled by capacity limitations: when are they successful?
    Gaissmaier W; Schooler LJ; Rieskamp J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):966-82. PubMed ID: 16938040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.