334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24628765)
1. Persistency of accuracy of genomic breeding values for different simulated pig breeding programs in developing countries.
Akanno EC; Schenkel FS; Sargolzaei M; Friendship RM; Robinson JA
J Anim Breed Genet; 2014 Oct; 131(5):367-78. PubMed ID: 24628765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Opportunities for genome-wide selection for pig breeding in developing countries.
Akanno EC; Schenkel FS; Sargolzaei M; Friendship RM; Robinson JA
J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4617-27. PubMed ID: 24078617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations.
Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC
J Anim Sci; 2010 Jan; 88(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 19749023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
Muir WM
J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genotyping strategies for genomic selection in small dairy cattle populations.
Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
Animal; 2012 Aug; 6(8):1216-24. PubMed ID: 23217224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors affecting the accuracy of genomic selection for growth and wood quality traits in an advanced-breeding population of black spruce (Picea mariana).
Lenz PRN; Beaulieu J; Mansfield SD; Clément S; Desponts M; Bousquet J
BMC Genomics; 2017 Apr; 18(1):335. PubMed ID: 28454519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using selection index theory to estimate consistency of multi-locus linkage disequilibrium across populations.
Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Calus MP
BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 26187501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Random forest estimation of genomic breeding values for disease susceptibility over different disease incidences and genomic architectures in simulated cow calibration groups.
Naderi S; Yin T; König S
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Sep; 99(9):7261-7273. PubMed ID: 27344385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of genomic prediction using deregressed breeding values estimated from purebred and crossbred offspring phenotypes in pigs.
Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Veroneze R; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26440000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of genome-enabled prediction exploring purebred and crossbred pig populations.
Veroneze R; Lopes MS; Hidalgo AM; Guimarães SE; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Lopes PS; Knol EF; M van Arendonk JA; Bastiaansen JW
J Anim Sci; 2015 Oct; 93(10):4684-91. PubMed ID: 26523561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in crossbred beef cattle.
Mujibi FD; Nkrumah JD; Durunna ON; Stothard P; Mah J; Wang Z; Basarab J; Plastow G; Crews DH; Moore SS
J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3353-61. PubMed ID: 21642493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficiency of genomic selection in a purebred pig male line.
Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4164-76. PubMed ID: 22859761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Persistency of Prediction Accuracy and Genetic Gain in Synthetic Populations Under Recurrent Genomic Selection.
Müller D; Schopp P; Melchinger AE
G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Mar; 7(3):801-811. PubMed ID: 28064189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection.
Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):16. PubMed ID: 25887297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
