74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24629455)
1. Comparative biomechanical study on three miniplates osteosynthesis systems for stabilisation of low condylar fractures of the mandible.
Hakim SG; Wolf M; Wendlandt R; Kimmerle H; Sieg P; Jacobsen HC
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 52(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 24629455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical analysis and comparison between 'Zeta' miniplate design and conventional miniplate system for fixation of fracture segments in transition zone of parasymphysis body region of mandible - an in vitro study.
Kumar M; Aurora JK; Dubey KN; Tandon P; Sharma P
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 62(5):441-447. PubMed ID: 38637215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of bite force evaluation for mandibular angle fracture fixation by conventional miniplates versus new design miniplates: a clinical study.
Gamit M; Patel Y; Sood R; Vadera H; Savjani K; Bhatti Z
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 28(2):645-652. PubMed ID: 37740128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-screw osteosynthesis of the mandibular condylar head with different screw materials: a finite element analysis.
Schönegg D; Koch A; Müller GT; Blumer M; Wagner MEH
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2024 May; 27(7):878-882. PubMed ID: 37154519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An In vitro study of biomechanical comparison between titanium 4-hole 3D plates and titanium conventional 4-hole miniplates for internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures.
Tharakan M; Kumar L K S; Chandrachood M
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2022; 12(5):683-686. PubMed ID: 36071928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The biomechanical stability of miniplate osteosynthesis configurations in bilateral mandibular angle fractures.
Ay N; Yildirimturk Dogan S; Sirin Y
J Oral Sci; 2023 Oct; 65(4):265-269. PubMed ID: 37648469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Z-shaped Miniplates vs Conventional Miniplates for Fixation of Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fractures.
Abdou Ata MAE; Marzook HAM; Tawfik MA; Elmissiry ZMA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Oct; 24(10):761-770. PubMed ID: 38152909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Re: Biomechanical analysis and comparison between 'zeta' miniplate design and conventional miniplate system for fixation of fracture segments in transition zone of parasymphysis body region of mandible - An in vitro study.
Sahni V
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 May; 62(4):388. PubMed ID: 38614943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Novel Design of Interlocking 3-Dimensional Miniplate in Mandibular Angle Fractures: An In Vitro Study.
Kreshanti P; Supriadi S; Kekalih A; Rahyussalim AJ; Priosoeryanto BP; Noviana D; Hatibie MJ; Sukasah CL; Aditya A
J Craniofac Surg; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38830036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single linear miniplate versus rectangular grid plate in the treatment of mandibular angle fractures: A prospective, clinico-radiographic, comparative study.
Das MK; Mishra M; Singh G; Mondal S
Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2023; 14(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 37273441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Evaluation of Masticatory Bite Force in Mandible Fractures Treated with Three-Dimensional Curved Locking Strut Plate Versus Straight Locking Miniplate.
Virk SK; Gumber TK; Dhawan A; Bhullar RS; Kapila S
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2023 Dec; 22(4):1006-1021. PubMed ID: 38105849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effective strategies in the management of anterior mandibular fractures: a comprehensive systematic review.
Savani R; Weihsin H; Patel S; Shah N; Chauhan S; Chavda Y
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 May; 62(4):349-360. PubMed ID: 38604919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New design titanium miniplate versus conventional miniplate in treatment of mandibular angle fractures: A comparative study.
Vishnani R; Pattanshetti C; Gilani R; Sankeshwari B
Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2023; 14(3):420-425. PubMed ID: 38273910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bite Force Evaluation of Conventional Plating System Versus Locking Plating System for Mandibular Fracture.
Giri KY; Sahu P; Rastogi S; Dandriyal R; Mall S; Singh AP; Indra B NP; Pratap Singh H
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2015 Dec; 14(4):972-8. PubMed ID: 26604472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Finite Element Analysis of Single, Double & Matrix Miniplate in Fracture of the Mandibular ANGLE Region: An In Vitro Study.
Subramanian A; Rudagi BM; Londhe P; Palande C
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2024 Feb; 23(1):114-121. PubMed ID: 38312983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of 2 mm single locking miniplates versus 2 mm two non-locking miniplates in symphysis and parasymphysis fracture of mandible.
Vashistha A; Singh M; Chaudhary M; Agarwal N; Kaur G
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2017; 7(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 28316921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of single vs double noncompression miniplates in the management of subcondylar fracture of the mandible.
Rai A
Ann Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 2(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 23482969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing 3D and Standard Miniplates in Treatment of Mandibular Symphysis and Parasymphysis Fractures.
Agarwal M; Meena B; Gupta DK; Tiwari AD; Jakhar SK
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2014 Jun; 13(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 24821994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 2 mm Conventional Miniplates with Three-Dimensional Strut Plate in Mandibular Fractures.
Kaushik S; Ali I; Dubey M; Bajpai N
Ann Maxillofac Surg; 2020; 10(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 32855908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of different fixation techniques following modified sagittal split ramus osteotomy using buccal step: An
Warade PD; Kshirsagar R; Mishra P; Prasad P; Sardeshmukh A
Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2022; 13(3):443-448. PubMed ID: 36683918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
