349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24629617)
1. Assessment of the reliability of standard automated perimetry in regions of glaucomatous damage.
Gardiner SK; Swanson WH; Goren D; Mansberger SL; Demirel S
Ophthalmology; 2014 Jul; 121(7):1359-69. PubMed ID: 24629617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.
Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured with optical coherence tomography is related to visual function in glaucomatous eyes.
El Beltagi TA; Bowd C; Boden C; Amini P; Sample PA; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN
Ophthalmology; 2003 Nov; 110(11):2185-91. PubMed ID: 14597528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Flicker-defined form perimetry in glaucoma patients.
Horn FK; Kremers J; Mardin CY; Jünemann AG; Adler W; Tornow RP
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 253(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 25511293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Defining 10-2 visual field progression criteria: exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis using pointwise linear regression.
de Moraes CG; Song C; Liebmann JM; Simonson JL; Furlanetto RL; Ritch R
Ophthalmology; 2014 Mar; 121(3):741-9. PubMed ID: 24290806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Cello KE; Nelson-Quigg JM; Johnson CA
Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):314-22. PubMed ID: 10704546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients.
Blumenthal EZ; Sample PA; Zangwill L; Lee AC; Kono Y; Weinreb RN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 10704545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
Haymes SA; Hutchison DM; McCormick TA; Varma DK; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combined use of frequency doubling perimetry and polarimetric measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma detection.
Horn FK; Nguyen NX; Mardin CY; Jünemann AG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Feb; 135(2):160-8. PubMed ID: 12566019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Scanning laser polarimetry using variable corneal compensation in the detection of glaucoma with localized visual field defects.
Kook MS; Cho HS; Seong M; Choi J
Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1970-8. PubMed ID: 16185765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantification and Predictors of Visual Field Variability in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect, and Glaucomatous Eyes Using SITA-Faster.
Tan JCK; Agar A; Kalloniatis M; Phu J
Ophthalmology; 2024 Jun; 131(6):658-666. PubMed ID: 38110124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Within-test variability of frequency-doubling perimetry using a 24-2 test pattern.
Spry PG; Johnson CA
J Glaucoma; 2002 Aug; 11(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 12169968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of 10-2 Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma Patients with Early 24-2 Visual Field Loss.
West ME; Sharpe GP; Hutchison DM; Rafuse PE; Shuba LM; Nicolela MT; Vianna JR; Chauhan BC
Ophthalmology; 2021 Apr; 128(4):545-553. PubMed ID: 32898515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do Additional Testing Locations Improve the Detection of Macular Perimetric Defects in Glaucoma?
Montesano G; McKendrick AM; Turpin A; Brusini P; Oddone F; Fogagnolo P; Perdicchi A; Johnson CA; Lanzetta P; Rossetti LM; Garway-Heath DF; Crabb DP
Ophthalmology; 2021 Dec; 128(12):1722-1735. PubMed ID: 34153384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Novel Stimulus to Improve Perimetric Sampling within the Macula in Patients with Glaucoma.
Alluwimi MS; Swanson WH; King BJ
Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Apr; 98(4):374-383. PubMed ID: 33828040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of Criterion Bias on Perimetric Sensitivity and Response Variability in Glaucoma.
Rubinstein NJ; Turpin A; Denniss J; McKendrick AM
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 10(1):18. PubMed ID: 33510957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects.
Bayer AU; Erb C
Ophthalmology; 2002 May; 109(5):1009-17. PubMed ID: 11986111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of visual field defects in pre-perimetric glaucoma using fundus-oriented small-target perimetry.
Nakatani Y; Ohkubo S; Higashide T; Iwase A; Kani K; Sugiyama K
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jul; 56(4):330-8. PubMed ID: 22526617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
