These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24629617)

  • 21. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
    Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
    J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Diagnostic accuracy of the Matrix 24-2 and original N-30 frequency-doubling technology tests compared with standard automated perimetry.
    Racette L; Medeiros FA; Zangwill LM; Ng D; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):954-60. PubMed ID: 18326718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spatial pattern of glaucomatous visual field loss obtained with regionally condensed stimulus arrangements.
    Schiefer U; Papageorgiou E; Sample PA; Pascual JP; Selig B; Krapp E; Paetzold J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Nov; 51(11):5685-9. PubMed ID: 20538998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Montesano G; Bryan SR; Crabb DP; Fogagnolo P; Oddone F; McKendrick AM; Turpin A; Lanzetta P; Perdicchi A; Johnson CA; Garway-Heath DF; Brusini P; Rossetti LM
    Ophthalmology; 2019 Feb; 126(2):242-251. PubMed ID: 30114416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pulsar perimetry in the diagnosis of early glaucoma.
    Zeppieri M; Brusini P; Parisi L; Johnson CA; Sampaolesi R; Salvetat ML
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 149(1):102-12. PubMed ID: 19800607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements with scanning laser polarimetry predict glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Mohammadi K; Bowd C; Weinreb RN; Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Zangwill LM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Oct; 138(4):592-601. PubMed ID: 15488786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Performance of the Moorfields motion displacement test for identifying eyes with glaucoma.
    Ong EL; Zheng Y; Aung T; Tan L; Cheng CY; Wong TY; How A
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Jan; 121(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 24139154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical ability of Heidelberg retinal tomograph examination to detect glaucomatous visual field changes.
    Miglior S; Casula M; Guareschi M; Marchetti I; Iester M; Orzalesi N
    Ophthalmology; 2001 Sep; 108(9):1621-7. PubMed ID: 11535460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).
    Johnson CA; Sample PA; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JR; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12140023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry.
    Hood DC; Thienprasiddhi P; Greenstein VC; Winn BJ; Ohri N; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Feb; 45(2):492-8. PubMed ID: 14744890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A perimetric test procedure that uses structural information.
    Ganeshrao SB; McKendrick AM; Denniss J; Turpin A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Jan; 92(1):70-82. PubMed ID: 25415282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mapping of glaucomatous visual field defects by multifocal VEPs.
    Hasegawa S; Abe H
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Dec; 42(13):3341-8. PubMed ID: 11726643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Combining structural and functional testing for detection of glaucoma.
    Shah NN; Bowd C; Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN; Sample PA; Hoffmann EM; Zangwill LM
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1593-602. PubMed ID: 16949444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Differences in the Relation Between Perimetric Sensitivity and Variability Between Locations Across the Visual Field.
    Gardiner SK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Jul; 59(8):3667-3674. PubMed ID: 30029253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of learning effect on reliability parameters and global indices of standard automated perimetry in cases of primary open angle glaucoma.
    Tiwari US; Aishwarya A; Bhale A
    Rom J Ophthalmol; 2018; 62(4):277-281. PubMed ID: 30891523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Effect of Limiting the Range of Perimetric Sensitivities on Pointwise Assessment of Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma.
    Gardiner SK; Swanson WH; Demirel S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Jan; 57(1):288-94. PubMed ID: 26824408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Temporal Wedge Defects in Glaucoma: Structure/Function Correlation With Threshold Automated Perimetry of the Full Visual Field.
    Wall M; Lee EJ; Wanzek RJ; Chong LX; Turpin A
    J Glaucoma; 2020 Mar; 29(3):191-197. PubMed ID: 32108691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Scaling the structure--function relationship for clinical perimetry.
    Harwerth RS; Carter-Dawson L; Smith EL; Crawford ML
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Aug; 83(4):448-55. PubMed ID: 16029269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of Humphrey MATRIX and Swedish interactive threshold algorithm standard strategy in detecting early glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Prema R; George R; Hemamalini A; Sathyamangalam Ve R; Baskaran M; Vijaya L
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2009; 57(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 19384015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.