BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24629645)

  • 1. Does the presence or location of graphic markers affect untrained listeners' ratings of severity of dysphonia?
    Nagle KF; Helou LB; Solomon NP; Eadie TL
    J Voice; 2014 Jul; 28(4):469-75. PubMed ID: 24629645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of experience on judgments of dysphonia.
    Eadie TL; Kapsner M; Rosenzweig J; Waugh P; Hillel A; Merati A
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):564-73. PubMed ID: 19765949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of Visual Sort and Rate Versus Visual Analog Scales on the Reliability of Judgments of Dysphonia.
    Kapsner-Smith MR; Opuszynski A; Stepp CE; Eadie TL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 May; 64(5):1571-1580. PubMed ID: 33909472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical versus laboratory ratings of voice using the CAPE-V.
    Solomon NP; Helou LB; Stojadinovic A
    J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):e7-14. PubMed ID: 20430573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation.
    Lu FL; Matteson S
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 24841668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. GRBAS and Cape-V scales: high reliability and consensus when applied at different times.
    Nemr K; Simões-Zenari M; Cordeiro GF; Tsuji D; Ogawa AI; Ubrig MT; Menezes MH
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):812.e17-22. PubMed ID: 23026732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of listener experience and anchors on judgments of dysphonia.
    Eadie TL; Kapsner-Smith M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Apr; 54(2):430-47. PubMed ID: 20884782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory-perceptual Evaluation of Normal and Dysphonic Voices Using the Voice Deviation Scale.
    Yamasaki R; Madazio G; Leão SHS; Padovani M; Azevedo R; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 26873420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictive value and discriminant capacity of cepstral- and spectral-based measures during continuous speech.
    Lowell SY; Colton RH; Kelley RT; Mizia SA
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 23684735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
    Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the Accuracy of Medical Diagnoses Affect Novice Listeners' Auditory-Perceptual Judgments of Dysphonia Severity?
    Sauder C; Eadie T
    J Voice; 2020 Mar; 34(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 30195410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation of the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), and Gender in Brazilians With and Without Voice Disorders.
    Nemr K; Simões-Zenari M; de Souza GS; Hachiya A; Tsuji DH
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):765.e7-765.e11. PubMed ID: 26627119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonlinear dynamic analysis of disordered voice: the relationship between the correlation dimension (D2) and pre-/post-treatment change in perceived dysphonia severity.
    Awan SN; Roy N; Jiang JJ
    J Voice; 2010 May; 24(3):285-93. PubMed ID: 19502002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of cepstral analyses for differentiating normal from dysphonic voices: a comparative study of connected speech versus sustained vowel in European Portuguese female speakers.
    Brinca LF; Batista AP; Tavares AI; Gonçalves IC; Moreno ML
    J Voice; 2014 May; 28(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 24491499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of listener experience on Consensus Auditory-perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) ratings of postthyroidectomy voice.
    Helou LB; Solomon NP; Henry LR; Coppit GL; Howard RS; Stojadinovic A
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2010 Aug; 19(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 20484704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic and Perceptual Classification of Within-sample Normal, Intermittently Dysphonic, and Consistently Dysphonic Voice Types.
    Gaskill CS; Awan JA; Watts CR; Awan SN
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):218-228. PubMed ID: 27241579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spectral- and cepstral-based measures during continuous speech: capacity to distinguish dysphonia and consistency within a speaker.
    Lowell SY; Colton RH; Kelley RT; Hahn YC
    J Voice; 2011 Sep; 25(5):e223-32. PubMed ID: 20971612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward a more quantitative measure to assess severity of dysphonia: preliminary observations.
    Schaeffer N; Sidavi A
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 19616403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.
    Eadie TL; Baylor CR
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 16324823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Listeners' attitude toward people with dysphonia.
    Amir O; Levine-Yundof R
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):524.e1-10. PubMed ID: 23490129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.