These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24629645)

  • 21. Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.
    Maryn Y; Kim HT; Kim J
    J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26316139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Psychometric Characteristics: II European Portuguese Version (II EP CAPE-V).
    de Almeida SC; Mendes AP; Kempster GB
    J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):582.e5-582.e13. PubMed ID: 29936062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Longitudinal variations of laryngeal overpressure and voice-related quality of life in spasmodic dysphonia.
    Yeung JC; Fung K; Davis E; Rai SK; Day AM; Dzioba A; Bornbaum C; Doyle PC
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Mar; 125(3):661-6. PubMed ID: 25290557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perceptual evaluation of dysphonic voices: can a training protocol lead to the development of perceptual categories?
    Ghio A; Dufour S; Wengler A; Pouchoulin G; Revis J; Giovanni A
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):304-11. PubMed ID: 25516201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Spectral-cepstral estimation of dysphonia severity: external validation.
    Awan SN; Solomon NP; Helou LB; Stojadinovic A
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2013 Jan; 122(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 23472315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Developing auditory-perceptual judgment reliability in otolaryngology residents.
    Misono S; Merati AL; Eadie TL
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 22019147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Inferring speaker attributes in adductor spasmodic dysphonia: ratings from unfamiliar listeners.
    Isetti D; Xuereb L; Eadie TL
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2014 May; 23(2):134-45. PubMed ID: 24686338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Estimating dysphonia severity in continuous speech: application of a multi-parameter spectral/cepstral model.
    Awan SN; Roy N; Dromey C
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2009 Nov; 23(11):825-41. PubMed ID: 19891523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of experience on judgments of adductor spasmodic dysphonia.
    Eadie TL; Nicolici C; Baylor C; Almand K; Waugh P; Maronian N
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2007 Sep; 116(9):695-701. PubMed ID: 17926593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.
    Uloza V; Latoszek BBV; Ulozaite-Staniene N; Petrauskas T; Maryn Y
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 275(4):949-958. PubMed ID: 29442165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sustained vowels and continuous speech in the auditory-perceptual evaluation of dysphonia severity.
    Maryn Y; Roy N
    J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol; 2012; 24(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 22832675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of Dysphonia and Cognitive-Perceptual Listener Strategies on Speech Intelligibility.
    Porcaro CK; Evitts PM; King N; Hood C; Campbell E; White L; Veraguas J
    J Voice; 2020 Sep; 34(5):806.e7-806.e18. PubMed ID: 31031103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Top-down mechanisms in dysphonia perception: the need for blind tests.
    Ghio A; Révis J; Merienne S; Giovanni A
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):481-5. PubMed ID: 23809570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quantifying the cepstral peak prominence, a measure of dysphonia.
    Heman-Ackah YD; Sataloff RT; Laureyns G; Lurie D; Michael DD; Heuer R; Rubin A; Eller R; Chandran S; Abaza M; Lyons K; Divi V; Lott J; Johnson J; Hillenbrand J
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):783-8. PubMed ID: 25179777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Agreement between Transcription- and Rating-Based Intelligibility Measurements for Evaluation of Dysphonic Speech in Noise.
    Ishikawa K; Webster J; Ketring C
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2021 Oct; 35(10):983-995. PubMed ID: 33251880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Effect of Rating Method on Reliability of Judgments of Strain Across Populations.
    Sauder CL; Kapsner-Smith MR; Simmons E; Meyer T; Doyle PC; Eadie TL
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2024 Jan; 33(1):393-405. PubMed ID: 38060689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of pleasantness and severity in dysphonic and normal speakers.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):3014-21. PubMed ID: 12509023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.
    Law T; Kim JH; Lee KY; Tang EC; Lam JH; van Hasselt AC; Tong MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The phonatory deviation diagram: a novel objective measurement of vocal function.
    Madazio G; Leão S; Behlau M
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2011; 63(6):305-11. PubMed ID: 21625144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
    Mozzanica F; Ginocchio D; Borghi E; Bachmann C; Schindler A
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2013; 65(5):257-65. PubMed ID: 24714558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.