These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24629869)

  • 1. Friction between footwear and floor covered with solid particles under dry and wet conditions.
    Li KW; Meng F; Zhang W
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2014; 20(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 24629869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of shoe sole tread groove depth on the friction coefficient with different tread groove widths, floors and contaminants.
    Li KW; Wu HH; Lin YC
    Appl Ergon; 2006 Nov; 37(6):743-8. PubMed ID: 16427022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of roughness, floor polish, water, oil and ice on underfoot friction: current safety footwear solings are less slip resistant than microcellular polyurethane.
    Manning DP; Jones C
    Appl Ergon; 2001 Apr; 32(2):185-96. PubMed ID: 11277511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional levels of floor surface roughness for the prevention of slips and falls: clean-and-dry and soapsuds-covered wet surfaces.
    Kim IJ; Hsiao H; Simeonov P
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Jan; 44(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 22641153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Floor/shoe slip resistance measurement.
    Chaffin DB; Woldstad JC; Trujillo A
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 May; 53(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 1609738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Available friction of ladder shoes and slip potential for climbing on a straight ladder.
    Chang WR; Chang CC; Matz S
    Ergonomics; 2005 Jul; 48(9):1169-82. PubMed ID: 16251154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of shoe soling tread groove width on the coefficient of friction with different sole materials, floors, and contaminants.
    Li KW; Chen CJ
    Appl Ergon; 2004 Nov; 35(6):499-507. PubMed ID: 15374757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective study of floor surface, shoes, floor cleaning and slipping in US limited-service restaurant workers.
    Verma SK; Chang WR; Courtney TK; Lombardi DA; Huang YH; Brennan MJ; Mittleman MA; Ware JH; Perry MJ
    Occup Environ Med; 2011 Apr; 68(4):279-85. PubMed ID: 20935283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 1: friction mechanisms and definition of test conditions.
    Chang WR; Grönqvist R; Leclercq S; Myung R; Makkonen L; Strandberg L; Brungraber RJ; Mattke U; Thorpe SC
    Ergonomics; 2001 Oct; 44(13):1217-32. PubMed ID: 11794765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting slips based on the STM 603 whole-footwear tribometer under different coefficient of friction testing conditions.
    Beschorner KE; Iraqi A; Redfern MS; Cham R; Li Y
    Ergonomics; 2019 May; 62(5):668-681. PubMed ID: 30638144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a high slip-resistant footwear outsole using a hybrid rubber surface pattern.
    Yamaguchi T; Hokkirigawa K
    Ind Health; 2014; 52(5):414-23. PubMed ID: 25055846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences in Friction Performance between New and Worn Shoes.
    Cook A; Hemler S; Sundaram V; Chanda A; Beschorner K
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2020; 8(4):209-214. PubMed ID: 33955322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Slipping of the foot on the floor when pulling a pallet truck.
    Li KW; Chang CC; Chang WR
    Appl Ergon; 2008 Nov; 39(6):812-9. PubMed ID: 18222414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical modeling of footwear-fluid-floor interaction during slips.
    Gupta S; Chanda A
    J Biomech; 2023 Jul; 156():111690. PubMed ID: 37356270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of slip resistance under footwear materials, tread designs, floor contamination, and floor inclination conditions.
    Li KW; Chen CY; Chen CC; Liu L
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():3349-51. PubMed ID: 22317227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The validity and reliability of a portable slip meter for determining floor slipperiness during simulated heel strike.
    Grönqvist R; Hirvonen M; Rajamäki E; Matz S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2003 Mar; 35(2):211-25. PubMed ID: 12504142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceived floor slipperiness and floor roughness in a gait experiment.
    Yu R; Li KW
    Work; 2015; 50(4):649-57. PubMed ID: 24448018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fall protection. When 'wet floor' signs aren't enough.
    Kendzior RJ
    Occup Health Saf; 2002 Sep; 71(9):130-2. PubMed ID: 12369351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coefficient of friction testing parameters influence the prediction of human slips.
    Iraqi A; Cham R; Redfern MS; Beschorner KE
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():118-126. PubMed ID: 29866300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance testing of work shoes labeled as slip resistant.
    Jones T; Iraqi A; Beschorner K
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Apr; 68():304-312. PubMed ID: 29409649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.