127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2463006)
1. Concentration of bone marrow mononuclear cells for in vitro treatment and AB0-incompatible transplantation: a rapid and reproducible procedure using the haemonetics V50 cell separator.
Wiesneth M; Hertenstein B; Koerner K; Heimpel H; Heit W
Beitr Infusionsther; 1988; 21():340-5. PubMed ID: 2463006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Concentration of bone marrow progenitor cells by separation on a Percoll gradient using the Haemonetics model 30.
Humblet Y; Lefebvre P; Jacques JL; Bosly A; Feyens AM; Sekhavat M; Agaliotis D; Symann M
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1988 Jan; 3(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 2901880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rapid and automated processing of bone marrow grafts without Ficoll density gradient for transplantation of cryopreserved autologous or ABO-incompatible allogeneic bone marrow.
Schanz U; Gmür J
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1992 Dec; 10(6):507-13. PubMed ID: 1490200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Density-gradient separation for 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide purging of autologous bone marrow grafts.
Rowley S; Davis J; Braine H; Jones R; Yeager A; Saral R; Santos G
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 333():369-77. PubMed ID: 2308991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Techniques for bone marrow preparation--a comparison of various systems].
Zingsem J; Weisbach V; Zeiler T; Heuft HG; Siegert W; Eckstein R
Beitr Infusionsther; 1990; 26():208-10. PubMed ID: 1703832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone marrow processing on the Haemonetics V50 cell separator.
Anderson NA; Cornish JM; Godwin V; Gunstone MJ; Oakhill A; Pamphilon DH
Transfus Sci; 1990; 11(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 10149526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Semiautomated autologous bone marrow processing for transplantation.
Pierelli L; Menichella G; Paoloni A; Serafini R; Vittori M; Foddai ML; Meoni F; Rossi PL; Leone G; Mango G
Haematologica; 1991 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():10-1. PubMed ID: 1677909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors affecting volume reduction and red blood cell depletion of bone marrow on the COBE Spectra cell separator before haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Guttridge MG; Sidders C; Booth-Davey E; Pamphilon D; Watt SM
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2006 Aug; 38(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 16770313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Density gradient separation of hematopoietic stem cells in autologous bone marrow transplantation.
Iacone A; Quaglietta AM; D'Antonio D; Accorsi P; Dragani A; Angrilli F; Berardi A; Angelini A; Di Bartolomeo P; Di Bartolomeo G
Haematologica; 1991 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():18-21. PubMed ID: 1677910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Failure of bone marrow cryopreservation in chronic granulocytic leukemia: relation to excessive granulo-macrophagic progenitor pool.
Douay L; Lopez M; Gorin NC; Nauman A; Giarratana MC; Laporte JP; Stachowiak J; Salmon C; Duhamel G
Int J Cell Cloning; 1986 Jul; 4(4):250-62. PubMed ID: 2875118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Proliferative response of human marrow myeloid progenitor cells to in vivo treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone and in combination with interleukin-3 after autologous bone marrow transplantation.
Lemoli RM; Fortuna A; Fogli M; Gherlinzoni F; Rosti G; Catani L; Gozzetti A; Miggiano MC; Tura S
Exp Hematol; 1995 Dec; 23(14):1520-6. PubMed ID: 8542941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hemopoietic stem cell processing: comparison of progenitor cell recovery using the Cobe 2991 cell washer and the Haemonetics V50 apheresis system.
Preti RA; Ahmed T; Ayello J; Helson L; Argani I; Wuest D; Ciavarella D
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1992 May; 9(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 1377580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of non-cryopreservation on colony formation of committed progenitor cells of bone marrow.
Tajima T
Tokai J Exp Clin Med; 1988 Feb; 13(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 3068837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Engraftment with peripheral blood stem cells using noncontrolled-rate cryopreservation: comparison with autologous bone marrow transplantation.
Rosenfeld CS; Gremba C; Shadduck RK; Zeigler ZR; Nemunaitis J
Exp Hematol; 1994 Mar; 22(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 7509292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alterations in both the hematopoietic microenvironment and the progenitor cell population follow the recovery from myeloablative therapy and bone marrow transplantation.
Novitzky N; Mohamed R
Exp Hematol; 1995 Dec; 23(14):1661-6. PubMed ID: 8542962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Human bone marrow processing using Cobe 2991 and CS 3000 blood cell separators for further ex vivo manipulation.
Angelini A; Dragani A; Iacone A; D'Antonio D; Accorsi P; Quaglietta AM; Berardi A; Fioritoni G; Di Bartolomeo P; D'Emilio G
Haematologica; 1990; 75 Suppl 1():43-7. PubMed ID: 2351343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Autologous bone marrow processing for autotransplantation using an automated cell processor and a semiautomated procedure.
Pierelli L; Menichella G; Serafini R; de Martini M; Paoloni A; Foddai ML; Scambia G; Benedetti Panici PL; Mancuso S; Leone G
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1991 May; 7(5):355-61. PubMed ID: 2070144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison between two different procedures for bone marrow processing: a semiautomated procedure vs manual starch sedimentation.
Menichella G; Pierelli L; Serafini R; Foddai ML; Vittori M; Paoloni A; De Martini M; Rossi PL; Mango G; Bizzi B
Haematologica; 1991 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():12-4. PubMed ID: 1713872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The cryopreservation protocol optimal for progenitor recovery is not optimal for preservation of marrow repopulating ability.
Balint B; Ivanović Z; Petakov M; Taseski J; Jovcić G; Stojanović N; Milenković P
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Mar; 23(6):613-9. PubMed ID: 10217193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Continuous flow cell separator use for bone marrow processing.
Baker PK; Rhodes EG; Duguid JK
Transfus Sci; 1991; 12(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 10150913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
