361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24630817)
1. Reliability of scar assessments performed with an integrated skin testing device - the DermaLab Combo(®).
Gankande TU; Duke JM; Danielsen PL; DeJong HM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2014 Dec; 40(8):1521-9. PubMed ID: 24630817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interpretation of the DermaLab Combo® pigmentation and vascularity measurements in burn scar assessment: an exploratory analysis.
Gankande TU; Duke JM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2015 Sep; 41(6):1176-85. PubMed ID: 25703660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A modified Vancouver Scar Scale linked with TBSA (mVSS-TBSA): Inter-rater reliability of an innovative burn scar assessment method.
Gankande TU; Wood FM; Edgar DW; Duke JM; DeJong HM; Henderson AE; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2013 Sep; 39(6):1142-9. PubMed ID: 23433706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The inter-rater and test-retest reliability of skin thickness and skin elasticity measurements by the DermaLab Combo in healthy participants.
Peperkamp K; Verhulst AC; Tielemans HJP; Winters H; van Dalen D; Ulrich DJO
Skin Res Technol; 2019 Nov; 25(6):787-792. PubMed ID: 31106915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Scarbase Duo(®): Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and validity of a compact dual scar assessment tool.
Fell M; Meirte J; Anthonissen M; Maertens K; Pleat J; Moortgat P
Burns; 2016 Mar; 42(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 26774602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of tissue ultrasound palpation system (TUPS) in objective scar evaluation.
Lau JC; Li-Tsang CW; Zheng YP
Burns; 2005 Jun; 31(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 15896506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigating the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a panel of subjective and objective burn scar measurement tools.
Lee KC; Bamford A; Gardiner F; Agovino A; Ter Horst B; Bishop J; Sitch A; Grover L; Logan A; Moiemen NS
Burns; 2019 Sep; 45(6):1311-1324. PubMed ID: 31327551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement of elasticity and transepidermal water loss rate of burn scars with the Dermalab(®).
Anthonissen M; Daly D; Fieuws S; Massagé P; Van Brussel M; Vranckx J; Van den Kerckhove E
Burns; 2013 May; 39(3):420-8. PubMed ID: 23000371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring vascularity of hypertrophic scars by dermoscopy: Construct validity and predictive ability of scar thickness change.
Deng H; Li-Tsang CWP; Li J
Skin Res Technol; 2020 May; 26(3):369-375. PubMed ID: 31916320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of the skin compliance device in the assessment of scar pliability.
Cleary C; Sanders AK; Nick TG
J Hand Ther; 2007; 20(3):232-7; quiz 238. PubMed ID: 17658416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An effective procedure for skin stiffness measurement to improve Paediatric Burn Care.
Elrod J; Müller B; Mohr C; Meuli M; Mazza E; Schiestl C
Burns; 2019 Aug; 45(5):1102-1111. PubMed ID: 30833098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasound is a reproducible and valid tool for measuring scar height in children with burn scars: A cross-sectional study of the psychometric properties and utility of the ultrasound and 3D camera.
Simons M; Kee EG; Kimble R; Tyack Z
Burns; 2017 Aug; 43(5):993-1001. PubMed ID: 28238405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skin elasticity meter or subjective evaluation in scars: a reliability assessment.
Draaijers LJ; Botman YA; Tempelman FR; Kreis RW; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
Burns; 2004 Mar; 30(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 15019116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Objective measurement of scarring by multiple assessors: is the tissue tonometer a reliable option?
Corica GF; Wigger NC; Edgar DW; Wood FM; Carroll S
J Burn Care Res; 2006; 27(4):520-3. PubMed ID: 16819358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of an objective scar pigmentation measurement by using a spectrocolorimeter.
Li-Tsang CW; Lau JC; Liu SK
Burns; 2003 Dec; 29(8):779-84. PubMed ID: 14636751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Objective Burn Scar Assessment in Clinical Practice Using the Cutometer©: Introduction and Validation of a Standardized Measurement Protocol.
Klimitz FJ; Neubauer H; Stolle A; Ripper S; Daeschler SC; Aman M; Boecker A; Thomas B; Kneser U; Harhaus L
J Burn Care Res; 2023 Jan; 44(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 36300728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive validity of short term scar quality on final burn scar outcome using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in patients with minor to moderate burn severity.
Goei H; van der Vlies CH; Tuinebreijer WE; van Zuijlen PPM; Middelkoop E; van Baar ME
Burns; 2017 Jun; 43(4):715-723. PubMed ID: 28040371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Values of patients and caregivers for donor site scars: an inter-observer analysis between patients and caregivers and prediction of cosmetic satisfaction.
Eskes AM; Brölmann FE; van de Kar AL; Niessen FB; Lindeboom R; Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H
Burns; 2012 Sep; 38(6):796-801. PubMed ID: 22673119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of Repeated Measurements on Post-Burn Scars with Corneometer CM 825(®).
Anthonissen M; Daly D; Peeters R; Van Brussel M; Fieuws S; Moortgat P; Flour M; Van den Kerckhove E
Skin Res Technol; 2015 Aug; 21(3):302-12. PubMed ID: 25382262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of inter-rater reliability in pediatric burn scar assessment using a modified version of the Vancouver Scar Scale.
Forbes-Duchart L; Marshall S; Strock A; Cooper JE
J Burn Care Res; 2007; 28(3):460-7. PubMed ID: 17438503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
