These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1493 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24630848)
1. Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex. Wiethoff S; Hamada M; Rothwell JC Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(3):468-75. PubMed ID: 24630848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions. Horvath JC; Vogrin SJ; Carter O; Cook MJ; Forte JD Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2629-42. PubMed ID: 27150317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans. Batsikadze G; Moliadze V; Paulus W; Kuo MF; Nitsche MA J Physiol; 2013 Apr; 591(7):1987-2000. PubMed ID: 23339180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation. Dyke K; Kim S; Jackson GM; Jackson SR Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 27387569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter- and Intra-individual Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) at Varying Current Intensities. Chew T; Ho KA; Loo CK Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(6):1130-7. PubMed ID: 26294061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 25hours. Zappasodi F; Musumeci G; Navarra R; Di Lazzaro V; Caulo M; Uncini A Neurophysiol Clin; 2018 Apr; 48(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 29248201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation can induce bidirectional shifts in motor cortical excitability in awake humans. Groppa S; Bergmann TO; Siems C; Mölle M; Marshall L; Siebner HR Neuroscience; 2010 Apr; 166(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 20083166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability. Tremblay S; Larochelle-Brunet F; Lafleur LP; El Mouderrib S; Lepage JF; Théoret H Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 44(5):2184-90. PubMed ID: 27336413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation. Jamil A; Batsikadze G; Kuo HI; Labruna L; Hasan A; Paulus W; Nitsche MA J Physiol; 2017 Feb; 595(4):1273-1288. PubMed ID: 27723104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bidirectional variability in motor cortex excitability modulation following 1 mA transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy participants. Strube W; Bunse T; Nitsche MA; Nikolaeva A; Palm U; Padberg F; Falkai P; Hasan A Physiol Rep; 2016 Aug; 4(15):. PubMed ID: 27495298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Labruna L; Jamil A; Fresnoza S; Batsikadze G; Kuo MF; Vanderschelden B; Ivry RB; Nitsche MA Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 26493498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of anodal tDCS duration threshold for reversal of corticospinal excitability: An investigation for induction of counter-regulatory mechanisms. Hassanzahraee M; Nitsche MA; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(3):832-839. PubMed ID: 32289714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ca2+ channel dynamics explain the nonlinear neuroplasticity induction by cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex. Mosayebi-Samani M; Melo L; Agboada D; Nitsche MA; Kuo MF Eur Neuropsychopharmacol; 2020 Sep; 38():63-72. PubMed ID: 32768154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acute changes in motor cortical excitability during slow oscillatory and constant anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Bergmann TO; Groppa S; Seeger M; Mölle M; Marshall L; Siebner HR J Neurophysiol; 2009 Oct; 102(4):2303-11. PubMed ID: 19692511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans. Bashir S; Ahmad S; Alatefi M; Hamza A; Sharaf M; Fecteau S; Yoo WK Physiol Rep; 2019 Jul; 7(13):e14087. PubMed ID: 31301123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Excitability modulation of the motor system induced by transcranial direct current stimulation: a multimodal approach. Pellicciari MC; Brignani D; Miniussi C Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():569-80. PubMed ID: 23845429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transcranial direct-current stimulation combined with attention increases cortical excitability and improves motor learning in healthy volunteers. Yamaguchi T; Moriya K; Tanabe S; Kondo K; Otaka Y; Tanaka S J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Feb; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 32075667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the after-effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the motor cortex in patients with stroke and healthy volunteers. Suzuki K; Fujiwara T; Tanaka N; Tsuji T; Masakado Y; Hase K; Kimura A; Liu M Int J Neurosci; 2012 Nov; 122(11):675-81. PubMed ID: 22747238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Voluntary movement reverses the effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on corticomotor excitability. Ataoglu EE; Caglayan HB; Cengiz B Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2653-2659. PubMed ID: 28577024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]