These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
29. Additive functions in boolean models of gene regulatory network modules. Darabos C; Di Cunto F; Tomassini M; Moore JH; Provero P; Giacobini M PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e25110. PubMed ID: 22132067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Live cell imaging of yeast. Rines DR; Thomann D; Dorn JF; Goodwin P; Sorger PK Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2011 Sep; 2011(9):. PubMed ID: 21880825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Modeling the normal and neoplastic cell cycle with "realistic Boolean genetic networks": their application for understanding carcinogenesis and assessing therapeutic strategies. Szallasi Z; Liang S Pac Symp Biocomput; 1998; ():66-76. PubMed ID: 9697172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Identification of a topological characteristic responsible for the biological robustness of regulatory networks. Wu Y; Zhang X; Yu J; Ouyang Q PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Jul; 5(7):e1000442. PubMed ID: 19629157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Optimising Boolean Synthetic Regulatory Networks to Control Cell States. Taou N; Lones M IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2021; 18(6):2649-2658. PubMed ID: 32078555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Complementation used to clone a human homologue of the fission yeast cell cycle control gene cdc2. Lee MG; Nurse P Nature; 1987 May 7-13; 327(6117):31-5. PubMed ID: 3553962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Details and concerns regarding the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint in budding yeast. Weinert T; Little E; Shanks L; Admire A; Gardner R; Putnam C; Michelson R; Nyberg K; Sundareshan P Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 2000; 65():433-41. PubMed ID: 12760059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Robustness and adaptation reveal plausible cell cycle controlling subnetwork in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Huang JY; Huang CW; Kao KC; Lai PY Gene; 2013 Apr; 518(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 23274654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ergodic sets as cell phenotype of budding yeast cell cycle. Todd RG; Helikar T PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e45780. PubMed ID: 23049686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Funneled potential and flux landscapes dictate the stabilities of both the states and the flow: Fission yeast cell cycle. Luo X; Xu L; Han B; Wang J PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Sep; 13(9):e1005710. PubMed ID: 28892489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The spindle checkpoint: assays for the analysis of spindle checkpoint arrest and recovery. Fernius J; Hardwick KG Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 545():243-58. PubMed ID: 19475393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Superstability of the yeast cell-cycle dynamics: ensuring causality in the presence of biochemical stochasticity. Braunewell S; Bornholdt S J Theor Biol; 2007 Apr; 245(4):638-43. PubMed ID: 17204290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]