117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2463133)
1. Comparison of absorption measurements of DNA stain content by utilizing video and scanning image cytometers.
Allison DC; Mayall BH; Levin J
Cytometry; 1988 Nov; 9(6):573-8. PubMed ID: 2463133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Increased accuracy and speed of absorption cytometric DNA measurements by automatic corrections for nuclear darkness.
Allison DC; Lawrence GN; Ridolpho PF; O'Grady BJ; Rasch RW; Rasch EM
Cytometry; 1984 May; 5(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 6375996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increased accuracy of absorption cytophotometric DNA values by control of stain intensity.
Allison DC; Ridolpho PF; Rasch EM; Rasch RW; Johnson TS
J Histochem Cytochem; 1981 Oct; 29(10):1219-28. PubMed ID: 6170668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Glare-correction in DNA image cytometry.
Kindermann D; Hilgers CH
Anal Cell Pathol; 1994 Feb; 6(2):165-80. PubMed ID: 8167099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methodological aspects of DNA image cytometry in normal bone marrow smears.
Widell S; Czader M; Porwit A; Reizenstein P; Hast R; Auer G
Anal Cell Pathol; 1993 Nov; 5(6):367-76. PubMed ID: 7508257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Discrimination of G1, S, and G2 cells using high-resolution TV-scanning and multivariate analysis methods.
Abmayr W; Giaretti W; Gais P; Dörmer P
Cytometry; 1982 Mar; 2(5):316-26. PubMed ID: 7075396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in the flow and absorption cytometric DNA distributions of mouse hepatocytes and tumor cells.
Bose KK; Curley S; Smith WJ; Allison DC
Cytometry; 1989 Jul; 10(4):388-93. PubMed ID: 2766884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nonspecific light loss and intrinsic DNA variation problems associated with feulgen DNA cytophotometry.
Miksche JP; Dhillon SS; Berlyn GP; Landauer KJ
J Histochem Cytochem; 1979 Oct; 27(10):1377-9. PubMed ID: 92496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of megakaryocyte frequency and ploidy distribution in unfractionated murine bone marrow.
Corash L; Levin J; Mok Y; Baker G; McDowell J
Exp Hematol; 1989 Mar; 17(3):278-86. PubMed ID: 2465169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Refinements in absorption-cytometric measurements of cellular DNA content.
Allison DC
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1985; 196():167-85. PubMed ID: 2417258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrophoretic separation of nucleic acids: evaluation by video and photographic densitometry.
Freeman SE; Larcom LL; Thompson BD
Electrophoresis; 1990 May; 11(5):425-31. PubMed ID: 2364929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A visible DNA-protein stain: Feulgen-Pararosanilin(SO2) Light Green.
Oud PS; Pahlplatz MM; Hermkens HG; Tas J; James J; Vooijs GP
Acta Histochem Suppl; 1986; 32():215-9. PubMed ID: 2422687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Total nucleated cell differential for blood and bone marrow using a single tube in a five-color flow cytometer.
Björnsson S; Wahlström S; Norström E; Bernevi I; O'Neill U; Johansson E; Runström H; Simonsson P
Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2008 Mar; 74(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 18061952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of a method for simultaneous analysis of cell surface phenotype and cell cycle in human bone marrow and peripheral blood leukocytes by flow cytometry: the value of both internal and external standards.
Jensen IM; Kristensen JS; Thomsen M; Ellegaard J; Hokland P
Anal Cell Pathol; 1993 Jul; 5(4):213-23. PubMed ID: 7689857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flow cytometry of mouse bone marrow cells cultured in vivo or in vitro.
Benestad HB; Strøm-Gundersen I
Exp Hematol; 1982 Apr; 10(4):343-51. PubMed ID: 6178614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flow cytometry instrumentation in research and clinical laboratories.
Bogh LD; Duling TA
Clin Lab Sci; 1993; 6(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 10146217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computerized measurement of the DNA content, areas, and autoradiographic grains of the same nuclei: demonstration that lightly (3H)thymidine-labeled bone marrow cells are predominantly in G0/G1 and G2.
Allison DC; Meyne J; Ridolpho PF; Bose K; Chakerian M; Robertson J
J Histochem Cytochem; 1984 Nov; 32(11):1197-203. PubMed ID: 6386975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cytophotometric comparisons of DNA levels in neuronal and glial cells of the cerebellum: a comparative study.
Lee GM; Rasch EM; Thornthwaite JT
Cell Biochem Funct; 1984 Oct; 2(4):225-36. PubMed ID: 6518623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laser scanning cytometry distinguishes lymphocytes, monocytes, and granulocytes by differences in their chromatin structure.
Bedner E; Burfeind P; Gorczyca W; Melamed MR; Darzynkiewicz Z
Cytometry; 1997 Nov; 29(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 9389435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Scanning microfluorometric measurements of acriflavine-Feulgen-SITS-stained fibroblasts during G0-G1 transition.
Wöllmer W
Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Dec; 3(4):305-8. PubMed ID: 6174059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
