BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24631431)

  • 1. Preventing repeat pregnancy in adolescents: is immediate postpartum insertion of the contraceptive implant cost effective?
    Han L; Teal SB; Sheeder J; Tocce K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 211(1):24.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24631431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents: do immediate postpartum contraceptive implants make a difference?
    Tocce KM; Sheeder JL; Teal SB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):481.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22631865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-Effectiveness of Immediate Compared With Delayed Postpartum Etonogestrel Implant Insertion.
    Gariepy AM; Duffy JY; Xu X
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 126(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 26241255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preventing repeat adolescent pregnancies with early adoption of the contraceptive implant.
    Stevens-Simon C; Kelly L; Singer D
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 10224547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Committee opinion no. 539: adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices.
    Committee on Adolescent Health Care Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working Group, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Oct; 120(4):983-8. PubMed ID: 22996129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long acting reversible contraception in postpartum adolescents: early initiation of etonogestrel implant is superior to IUDs in the outpatient setting.
    Tocce K; Sheeder J; Python J; Teal SB
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 25(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 22051792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical care cost savings from adolescent contraceptive use.
    Trussell J; Koenig J; Stewart F; Darroch JE
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1997; 29(6):248-55, 295. PubMed ID: 9429869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.
    Forrest JD; Samara R
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 8886761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-benefit analysis of state- and hospital-funded postpartum intrauterine contraception at a university hospital for recent immigrants to the United States.
    Rodriguez MI; Caughey AB; Edelman A; Darney PD; Foster DG
    Contraception; 2010 Apr; 81(4):304-8. PubMed ID: 20227546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medicaid savings from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project: a cost-savings analysis.
    Madden T; Barker AR; Huntzberry K; Secura GM; Peipert JF; McBride TD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Dec; 219(6):595.e1-595.e11. PubMed ID: 30194049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Six- and twelve-month documented removal rates among women electing postpartum inpatient compared to delayed or interval contraceptive implant insertions after Medicaid payment reform.
    Crockett AH; Pickell LB; Heberlein EC; Billings DL; Mills B
    Contraception; 2017 Jan; 95(1):71-76. PubMed ID: 27400823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immediate postpartum etonogestrel implant: a contraception option with long-term continuation.
    Wilson S; Tennant C; Sammel MD; Schreiber C
    Contraception; 2014 Sep; 90(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 24993485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of immediate postpartum compared to delayed postpartum and interval etonogestrel contraceptive implant insertion on removal rates for bleeding.
    Ireland LD; Goyal V; Raker CA; Murray A; Allen RH
    Contraception; 2014 Sep; 90(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 24973904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeat fertility and contraceptive implant use among Medicaid recipients in Colorado.
    Ricketts SA
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(6):278-80, 284. PubMed ID: 8959419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-savings from the provision of specific contraceptive methods in 2009.
    Foster DG; Biggs MA; Malvin J; Bradsberry M; Darney P; Brindis CD
    Womens Health Issues; 2013; 23(4):e265-71. PubMed ID: 23816157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preventing repeat teen pregnancy: postpartum depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, oral contraceptive pills, or the patch?
    Thurman AR; Hammond N; Brown HE; Roddy ME
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 20(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 17418388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An initiative to implement immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception in rural New Mexico.
    Palm HC; Degnan JH; Biefeld SD; Reese AL; Espey E; Hofler LG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4S):S911.e1-S911.e7. PubMed ID: 31978431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Postpartum contraceptive counseling for first-time adolescent mothers: a randomized controlled trial.
    Frarey A; Gurney EP; Sober S; Whittaker PG; Schreiber CA
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Feb; 299(2):361-369. PubMed ID: 30470924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of publicly funded family planning clinic services on unintended pregnancies and government cost savings.
    Frost JJ; Finer LB; Tapales A
    J Health Care Poor Underserved; 2008 Aug; 19(3):778-96. PubMed ID: 18677070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coverage of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception has improved birth intervalsĀ forĀ at-risk populations.
    Liberty A; Yee K; Darney BG; Lopez-Defede A; Rodriguez MI
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4S):S886.e1-S886.e9. PubMed ID: 31846612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.