304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24631440)
21. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes.
Glantz JC
J Reprod Med; 2005 Apr; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 15916205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Elective and routine induction of labor. A retrospective analysis of 274 cases.
Wigton TR; Wolk BM
J Reprod Med; 1994 Jan; 39(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 8169911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Labor Induction at 39 Weeks Compared with Expectant Management in Low-Risk Parous Women.
Wagner SM; Sandoval G; Grobman WA; Bailit JL; Wapner RJ; Varner MW; Thorp JM; Prasad M; Tita ATN; Saade GR; Sorokin Y; Rouse DJ; Tolosa JE;
Am J Perinatol; 2022 Apr; 39(5):519-525. PubMed ID: 32916751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mode of delivery in women with class III obesity: planned cesarean compared with induction of labor.
Subramaniam A; Jauk VC; Goss AR; Alvarez MD; Reese C; Edwards RK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):700.e1-9. PubMed ID: 24956550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy.
Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Gienger A; Cheng YW; McDonald KM; Shaffer BL; Owens DK; Bravata DM
Ann Intern Med; 2009 Aug; 151(4):252-63, W53-63. PubMed ID: 19687492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Elective Induction of Labor in the 39th Week of Gestation Compared With Expectant Management of Low-Risk Multiparous Women.
Sinkey RG; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Ausbeck E; Subramaniam A; Neely CL; Casey BM; Tita AT
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 134(2):282-287. PubMed ID: 31306328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Induction of labor and the risk for emergency cesarean section in nulliparous and multiparous women.
Thorsell M; Lyrenäs S; Andolf E; Kaijser M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Oct; 90(10):1094-9. PubMed ID: 21679162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pregnancy outcomes of elective induction in low-risk term pregnancies: A propensity-score analysis.
Na ED; Chang SW; Ahn EH; Jung SH; Kim YR; Jung I; Cho HY
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Feb; 98(8):e14284. PubMed ID: 30813131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Term elective induction of labour and perinatal outcomes in obese women: retrospective cohort study.
Lee VR; Darney BG; Snowden JM; Main EK; Gilbert W; Chung J; Caughey AB
BJOG; 2016 Jan; 123(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 26840780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor at term.
Allen VM; O'Connell CM; Baskett TF
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 108(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 16880297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of recommended changes in labor management for prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.
Thuillier C; Roy S; Peyronnet V; Quibel T; Nlandu A; Rozenberg P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Mar; 218(3):341.e1-341.e9. PubMed ID: 29291413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impacts of embracing 39-week elective induction across an entire labor and delivery unit.
Jelks AT; Yao AQ; Byrne JD
AJOG Glob Rep; 2023 May; 3(2):100168. PubMed ID: 36941864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study.
Stock SJ; Ferguson E; Duffy A; Ford I; Chalmers J; Norman JE
BMJ; 2012 May; 344():e2838. PubMed ID: 22577197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of neonatal outcomes in elective repeat cesarean delivery at term according to weeks of gestation.
Ertuğrul S; Gün I; Müngen E; Muhçu M; Kılıç S; Atay V
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Jan; 39(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 22889289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Preventive induction of labor for non-urgent indications at term and maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Zhang L; Zhang H; Zhang J; Zhang JW; Ye JF; Branch DW
Reprod Health; 2016 Apr; 13():46. PubMed ID: 27103111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of Maternal Labor-Related Complications and Neonatal Outcomes Following Elective Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks of Gestation vs Expectant Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Hong J; Atkinson J; Roddy Mitchell A; Tong S; Walker SP; Middleton A; Lindquist A; Hastie R
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 May; 6(5):e2313162. PubMed ID: 37171818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Hersh AR; Skeith AE; Sargent JA; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 220(6):590.e1-590.e10. PubMed ID: 30768934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Early-onset severe preeclampsia: induction of labor vs elective cesarean delivery and neonatal outcomes.
Alanis MC; Robinson CJ; Hulsey TC; Ebeling M; Johnson DD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):262.e1-6. PubMed ID: 18771976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The impact of labor at term on measures of neonatal outcome.
Richardson BS; Czikk MJ; daSilva O; Natale R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 192(1):219-26. PubMed ID: 15672028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Induction of labor versus expectant management among low-risk patients with one prior cesarean delivery.
Ukoha EP; Wen T; Reddy UM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38852849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
