These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24631920)

  • 1. Human biological monitoring for exposure assessment in response to an incident involving hazardous materials.
    Scheepers PT; van Brederode NE; Bos PM; Nijhuis NJ; van de Weerdt RH; van der Woude I; Eggens ML
    Toxicol Lett; 2014 Dec; 231(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 24631920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying a role for human biomonitoring in incidents involving hazardous materials.
    Scheepers PT; Smolders R
    Toxicol Lett; 2014 Dec; 231(3):291-4. PubMed ID: 25500134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human biological monitoring--a versatile tool in the aftermath of a CBRN incident.
    Müller M; Schmiechen K; Heselmann D; Schmidt L; Göen T
    Toxicol Lett; 2014 Dec; 231(3):306-14. PubMed ID: 25261589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of biological monitoring for exposure assessment following chemical incidents: a procedure for decision making.
    Scheepers PT; Bos PM; Konings J; Janssen NA; Grievink L
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2011; 21(3):247-61. PubMed ID: 20336049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human biomonitoring after chemical incidents and during short-term maintenance work as a tool for exposure analysis and assessment.
    Bader M; Van Weyenbergh T; Verwerft E; Van Pul J; Lang S; Oberlinner C
    Toxicol Lett; 2014 Dec; 231(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 25290578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of human biomonitoring (HBM) of chemical exposure in the characterisation of health risks under REACH.
    Boogaard PJ; Aylward LL; Hays SM
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2012 Feb; 215(2):238-41. PubMed ID: 22177527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Human biomonitoring: state of the art.
    Angerer J; Ewers U; Wilhelm M
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2007 May; 210(3-4):201-28. PubMed ID: 17376741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human biomonitoring assessment values: approaches and data requirements.
    Angerer J; Aylward LL; Hays SM; Heinzow B; Wilhelm M
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2011 Sep; 214(5):348-60. PubMed ID: 21764371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biological monitoring guidance values for chemical incidents.
    Cocker J; Jones K; Bos PM
    Toxicol Lett; 2014 Dec; 231(3):324-7. PubMed ID: 24973493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survey on methodologies in the risk assessment of chemical exposures in emergency response situations in Europe.
    Heinälä M; Gundert-Remy U; Wood MH; Ruijten M; Bos PM; Zitting A; Bull S; Russell D; Nielsen E; Cassel G; Leffler P; Tissot S; Vincent JM; Santonen T
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Jan; 244-245():545-54. PubMed ID: 23260870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Framework for the development and application of environmental biological monitoring guidance values.
    Bevan R; Angerer J; Cocker J; Jones K; Koch HM; Sepai O; Schoeters G; Smolders R; Levy L
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Aug; 63(3):453-60. PubMed ID: 22683832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Highlights of recent studies and future plans for the French human biomonitoring (HBM) programme.
    Fréry N; Vandentorren S; Etchevers A; Fillol C
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2012 Feb; 215(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 21940210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpreting human biomonitoring data in a public health risk context using Biomonitoring Equivalents.
    Hays SM; Aylward LL
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2012 Feb; 215(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 22192580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Review of acute chemical incidents as a first step in evaluating the usefulness of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models in such incidents.
    Hunault CC; Boerleider RZ; Hof BG; Kliest JJ; Meijer M; Nijhuis NJ; de Vries I; Meulenbelt J
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2014 Feb; 52(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 24446967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomarkers of exposure in community settings.
    Metcalf SW; Orloff KG
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2004 Apr 23-May 28; 67(8-10):715-26. PubMed ID: 15192864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human biomonitoring: political benefits--scientific challenges. September 26-28, 2010.
    Kolossa-Gehring M
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2012 Feb; 215(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 22169170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biological monitoring involving children exposed to mercury from a barometer in a private residence.
    Scheepers PT; van Ballegooij-Gevers M; Jans H
    Toxicol Lett; 2014 Dec; 231(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 24699299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The importance of biological samples in longitudinal birth cohort studies.
    Jones R
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 23 Suppl 1():93-102. PubMed ID: 19490449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental chemicals in people: challenges in interpreting biomonitoring information.
    LaKind JS; Barraj L; Tran N; Aylward LL
    J Environ Health; 2008 May; 70(9):61-4. PubMed ID: 18517157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. External quality assessment of human biomonitoring in the range of environmental exposure levels.
    Göen T; Schaller KH; Drexler H
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2012 Feb; 215(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 21937272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.