These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24632796)

  • 1. Second order root control of self-ligating brackets and traditional brackets: a "typodont" study.
    Butti AC; Mangiacapra R; Saporito I; Augusti G; Salvato A; Re D
    Minerva Stomatol; 2014 Mar; 63(3):51-7. PubMed ID: 24632796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A "typodont" study of rate of orthodontic space closure: self-ligating systems vs. conventional systems.
    Saporito I; Butti AC; Salvato A; Biagi R
    Minerva Stomatol; 2011; 60(11-12):555-65. PubMed ID: 22210459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states.
    Thorstenson GA; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Oct; 120(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 11606960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrastructural effect of self-ligating bracket materials on stainless steel and superelastic NiTi wire surfaces.
    Choi S; Lee S; Cheong Y; Park KH; Park HK; Park YG
    Microsc Res Tech; 2012 Aug; 75(8):1076-83. PubMed ID: 22419658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-ligating vs conventional twin brackets during en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics.
    Miles PG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Aug; 132(2):223-5. PubMed ID: 17693373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Torque expression of self-ligating brackets.
    Badawi HM; Toogood RW; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):721-8. PubMed ID: 18456146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forces exerted by conventional and self-ligating brackets during simulated first- and second-order corrections.
    Pandis N; Eliades T; Partowi S; Bourauel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):738-42. PubMed ID: 18456148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Numeric modeling of torque capabilities of self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Huang Y; Keilig L; Rahimi A; Reimann S; Eliades T; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):638-43. PubMed ID: 19892278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules.
    Griffiths HS; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):670-5; quiz 754. PubMed ID: 15953891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement of friction forces between stainless steel wires and "reduced-friction" self-ligating brackets.
    Reznikov N; Har-Zion G; Barkana I; Abed Y; Redlich M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 20816303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires.
    Bednar JR; Gruendeman GW; Sandrik JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Dec; 100(6):513-22. PubMed ID: 1962604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts.
    Henao SP; Kusy RP
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 15132446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prevalence and type of pain during conventional and self-ligating orthodontic treatment.
    Tecco S; D'Attilio M; Tetè S; Festa F
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 19465738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Torque capabilities of self-ligating and conventional brackets under the effect of bracket width and free wire length.
    Huang Y; Keilig L; Rahimi A; Reimann S; Bourauel C
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2012 Nov; 15(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 23020696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sliding resistance of polycarbonate self-ligating brackets and stainless steel esthetic archwires.
    Hiroce M; Fernandes DJ; Elias CN; Miguel JA
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 23021118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro evaluation of the frictional forces between brackets and archwire with three passive self-ligating brackets.
    Cordasco G; Farronato G; Festa F; Nucera R; Parazzoli E; Grossi GB
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):643-6. PubMed ID: 19797412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A quantitative AFM analysis of nano-scale surface roughness in various orthodontic brackets.
    Lee GJ; Park KH; Park YG; Park HK
    Micron; 2010 Oct; 41(7):775-82. PubMed ID: 20646928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vivo and in vitro study of the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to enamel using halogen or LED light.
    Penido SM; Penido CV; dos Santos-Pinto A; Gandini LG; Bagnato VS
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 19388429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frictional evaluations of dental typodont models using four self-ligating designs and a conventional design.
    Henao SP; Kusy RP
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 15747819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.