160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24633747)
1. Maternal and neonatal outcome of labour induction at term comparing two regimens of misoprostol.
Kreft M; Krähenmann F; Roos M; Kurmanavicius J; Zimmermann R; Ochsenbein-Kölble N
J Perinat Med; 2014 Sep; 42(5):603-9. PubMed ID: 24633747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labour induction.
Rasheed R; Alam AA; Younus S; Raza F
J Pak Med Assoc; 2007 Aug; 57(8):404-7. PubMed ID: 17902524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective double blind study using oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labour induction.
Mehrotra S; Singh U; Gupta HP
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):461-4. PubMed ID: 20604647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour.
McMaster K; Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM
BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 24989790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of the outcome of induction of labor using 25 µg and 50 µg of vaginal misoprostol.
Loto OM; Ikuomola AA; Ayuba II; Onwudiegwu U
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Nov; 25(11):2359-62. PubMed ID: 22640229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study.
Bolla D; Weissleder SV; Radan AP; Gasparri ML; Raio L; Müller M; Surbek D
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):149. PubMed ID: 29747591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Misoprostol 50 microg sublingually versus vaginally for labor induction at term: a randomized study.
Caliskan E; Bodur H; Ozeren S; Corakci A; Ozkan S; Yucesoy I
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2005; 59(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 15640607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy and safety of misoprostol, dinoprostone and Cook's balloon for labour induction in women with foetal growth restriction at term.
Duro-Gómez J; Garrido-Oyarzún MF; Rodríguez-Marín AB; de la Torre González AJ; Arjona-Berral JE; Castelo-Branco C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Oct; 296(4):777-781. PubMed ID: 28831553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sublingual compared with vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term: a randomised controlled trial.
Bartusevicius A; Barcaite E; Krikstolaitis R; Gintautas V; Nadisauskiene R
BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1431-7. PubMed ID: 17083652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early amniotomy after vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial.
Makarem MH; Zahran KM; Abdellah MS; Karen MA
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Aug; 288(2):261-5. PubMed ID: 23430026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Safe induction of labour with low-dose misoprostol, but less effective than the conventional dinoprostone regimen.
Petersen JF; Bergholt T; Løkkegaard EC
Dan Med J; 2013 Sep; 60(9):A4706. PubMed ID: 24001467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol tablets in induction of labour at term.
Shetty A; Danielian P; Templeton A
BJOG; 2001 Mar; 108(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 11281461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Slow-release vaginal insert of misoprostol versus orally administrated solution of misoprostol for the induction of labour in primiparous term pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial.
Wallström T; Strandberg M; Gemzell-Danielsson K; Pilo C; Jarnbert-Pettersson H; Friman-Mathiasson M; Wiberg-Itzel E
BJOG; 2019 Aug; 126(9):1148-1155. PubMed ID: 30989788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Concurrent use of Foley catheter and misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety.
Lanka S; Surapaneni T; Nirmalan PK
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1527-33. PubMed ID: 24888911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of vaginal pH on labor induction with vaginal misoprostol.
Chandra S; Allen V; Lee W; Fanning C; Young D
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Jun; 17(6):387-91. PubMed ID: 16009641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomization of two dosing regimens of vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction in a low resource setting.
Adeniyi AA; Odukogbe AA; Olayemi A; Oladokun O; Adeniji AO; Aimakhu CO; Enakpene C
Niger J Clin Pract; 2014; 17(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 24714004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
