231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24634332)
1. Quantification of hemodialysis dose: what Kt/V
to choose?
Aatif T; Hassani K; Alayoud A; Zajjari Y; Maoujoud O; Benyahia M; Oualim Z
Int J Artif Organs; 2014 Jan; 37(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 24634332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of the ionic dialysance monitor on Kt measurement in hemodialysis.
Maduell F; Vera M; Arias M; Serra N; Blasco M; Bergadá E; Fontsere N; Cases A; Campistol JM
Am J Kidney Dis; 2008 Jul; 52(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 18455852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ionic dialysance and determination of Kt/V in on-line hemodiafiltration with simultaneous
pre- and post-dilution.
Créput C; Toledano D; Petitclerc T
Int J Artif Organs; 2013 May; 36(5):327-34. PubMed ID: 23504813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influential factors on dose by ionic dialysance in daily practice in chronic hemodialysis.
García Testal A; García Maset R; Fornés Ferrer V; Cañada Martínez AJ; Rico Salvador IS; Royo Maicas P; Fernández Najera JE; Olagüe Díaz P; Benedito Carrera C; Torregrosa De Juan E
Nephrol Ther; 2021 Apr; 17(2):101-107. PubMed ID: 33461895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Monitoring hemodialysis dose with ionic dialisance in on-line hemodiafiltration].
Maduell F; Puchades MJ; Navarro V; Torregrosa E; Rius A; Sánchez JJ
Nefrologia; 2005; 25(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16392302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of methods for determining urea distribution volume for routine use in on-line monitoring of haemodialysis adequacy.
Lindley EJ; Chamney PW; Wuepper A; Ingles H; Tattersall JE; Will EJ
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2009 Jan; 24(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 18697799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Body composition monitoring-derived urea distribution volume in children on chronic hemodialysis.
Zaloszyc A; Fischbach M; Schaefer B; Uhlmann L; Salomon R; Krid S; Schmitt CP
Pediatr Nephrol; 2016 Jun; 31(6):991-9. PubMed ID: 26754039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ionic dialysance: a new valid parameter for quantification of dialysis efficiency in acute renal failure?
Ridel C; Osman D; Mercadal L; Anguel N; Petitclerc T; Richard C; Vinsonneau C
Intensive Care Med; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-5. PubMed ID: 17235509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On-line assessment of delivered dialysis dose.
Di Filippo S; Andrulli S; Manzoni C; Corti M; Locatelli F
Kidney Int; 1998 Jul; 54(1):263-7. PubMed ID: 9648087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conventional blood sampling versus On-Line Clearance Monitoring.
Thomson D
EDTNA ERCA J; 2004; 30(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 15163027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Kt/V by ionic dialysance: Interpretation limits.
Alayoud A; Montassir D; Hamzi A; Zajjari Y; Bahadi A; Kabbaj DE; Maoujoud O; Aatif T; Hassani K; Benyahia M; Oualim Z
Indian J Nephrol; 2012 Sep; 22(5):333-9. PubMed ID: 23326042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dialysis dose (Kt/V) and clearance variation sensitivity using measurement of ultraviolet-absorbance (on-line), blood urea, dialysate urea and ionic dialysance.
Uhlin F; Fridolin I; Magnusson M; Lindberg LG
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2225-31. PubMed ID: 16611681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of hemodialysis adequacy by ionic dialysance: comparison to standard method of urea removal.
Racki S; Zaputović L; Maleta I; Grzetić M; Mavrić Z; Devcić B; Vujicić B
Ren Fail; 2005; 27(5):601-4. PubMed ID: 16153000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative assessment of sodium mass removal using ionic dialysance and sodium gradient as a proxy tool: Comparison of high-flux hemodialysis versus online hemodiafiltration.
Rodriguez A; Morena M; Bargnoux AS; Chenine L; Leray-Moragues H; Cristol JP; Canaud B
Artif Organs; 2021 Aug; 45(8):E280-E292. PubMed ID: 33507535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determination of dialysis dose: a clinical comparison of methods.
Ahrenholz P; Taborsky P; Bohling M; Rawer P; Ibrahim N; Gajdos M; Machek P; Sagova M; Gruber H; Moucka P; Rychlik I; Leimenstoll G; Vyskocil P; Toenne G; Possnickerova J; Woggan J; Riegel W; Schneider H; Wojke R
Blood Purif; 2011; 32(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 21860232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the length of each hemodialysis session by on-line dialysate urea monitoring.
Hernandez-Herrera G; Martin-Malo A; Rodriguez M; Aljama P
Nephron; 2001 Sep; 89(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 11528230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ionic dialysance as a method for the on-line monitoring of delivered dialysis without blood sampling.
Manzoni C; Di Filippo S; Corti M; Locatelli F
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1996 Oct; 11(10):2023-30. PubMed ID: 8918717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Urea distribution volume calculated by ionic dialysance].
Teruel JL; Merino JL; Fernández-Lucas M; Tenorio MT; Rivera M; Marcén R; Ortuño J
Nefrologia; 2006; 26(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 16649433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The monitoring of dialysis dose by ionic dialysance-based Kt reveals less dialysis adequacy than the Kt/V(UREA)-based measurement in critically ill patients with acute renal failure].
Serra Cabañas N; Barros Freiría X; Garro Martínez J; Blasco Pelícano M; Maduell Canals F; Torras Rabasa A; Poch López de Briñas E
Nefrologia; 2010; 30(2):232-5. PubMed ID: 20393623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Online conductivity monitoring of dialysis adequacy versus Kt/V derived from urea reduction ratio: a prospective study from a Saudi Center.
Al Saran K; Sabry A; Abdulghafour M; Yehia A
Ren Fail; 2010 Jan; 32(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 20113264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
