These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24634332)

  • 41. In vivo effects of dialysate flow rate on Kt/V in maintenance hemodialysis patients.
    Hauk M; Kuhlmann MK; Riegel W; Köhler H
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2000 Jan; 35(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 10620551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Two spent dialysate samples are sufficient for hemodialysis efficacy assessment.
    Kovacic V; Ljutic D
    Int J Artif Organs; 2005 Jan; 28(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 15742306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Routine online assessment of dialysis dose: Ionic dialysance or UV-absorbance monitoring?
    Petitclerc T; Ridel C
    Semin Dial; 2021 Mar; 34(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 33529406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Are Currently Used Bioimpedance Methods in Hemodialysis Comparable for Calculating Dialysis Dose?
    Arias-Guillén M; Masso E; Gomez M; Rodas L; Broseta J; Vera M; Rios J; Fontseré N; Maduell F
    Ther Apher Dial; 2020 Apr; 24(2):154-162. PubMed ID: 31325207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The urea [clearance x dialysis time] product (Kt) as an outcome-based measure of hemodialysis dose.
    Lowrie EG; Chertow GM; Lew NL; Lazarus JM; Owen WF
    Kidney Int; 1999 Aug; 56(2):729-37. PubMed ID: 10432415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Determination of the dose of dialysis with integrated modules in the same monitor].
    Torregrosa E; Hernández-Jaras J; García-Pérez H; Pons-Prades R; Calvo-Gordo C; Ríus-Peris A; Sánchez-Canel JJ; Pin-Godos M
    Nefrologia; 2006; 26(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 16808263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Analysis of factors associated with variability in haemodialysis adequacy.
    Lambie SH; Taal MW; Fluck RJ; McIntyre CW
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2004 Feb; 19(2):406-12. PubMed ID: 14736966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Individualized hemodialysis: Is similar hemodialysis adequacy possible using less water?
    Aktaş A; Özer H; Baloğlu İ; Tonbul HZ; Güney İ; Selçuk NY
    Turk J Med Sci; 2023; 53(6):1863-1869. PubMed ID: 38813487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Double target comparison of blood-side methods for measuring the hemodialysis dose.
    Prado M; Roa LM; Palma A; Milán JA
    Kidney Int; 2005 Dec; 68(6):2863-76. PubMed ID: 16316364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparisons of Kt/V evaluated using an online method and calculated from urea measurements in patients on intermittent hemodialysis.
    Grzegorzewska AE; Banachowicz W
    Hemodial Int; 2006 Oct; 10 Suppl 2():S5-9. PubMed ID: 17022752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of standard and artificial neural network estimators of hemodialysis adequacy.
    Fernández EA; Valtuille R; Rodriguez Presedo J; Willshaw P
    Artif Organs; 2005 Feb; 29(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 15670285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Improving the efficiency of short-term single-needle hemodialysis.
    Rostoker G; Griuncelli M; Loridon C; Bourlet T; Welsch K; Benmaadi A
    Ren Fail; 2009; 31(4):261-6. PubMed ID: 19462273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Epoetin requirement does not depend on dialysis dose when Kt/N > 1.33 in patients on regular dialysis treatment with cellulosic membranes and adequate iron stores.
    Movilli E; Cancarini GC; Vizzardi V; Camerini C; Brunori G; Cassamali S; Maiorca R
    J Nephrol; 2003; 16(4):546-51. PubMed ID: 14696757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Assessing dialysis adequacy and dietary intake in the individual hemodialysis patient.
    Kloppenburg WD; Stegeman CA; Hooyschuur M; van der Ven J; de Jong PE; Huisman RM
    Kidney Int; 1999 May; 55(5):1961-9. PubMed ID: 10231460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. What volume to choose to assess online Kt/V?
    Casino FG; Mancini E; Santarsia G; Mostacci SD; D'Elia F; Di Carlo M; Iannuzzella F; Rossi L; Vernaglione L; Grimaldi D; Rapanà R; Basile C
    J Nephrol; 2020 Feb; 33(1):137-146. PubMed ID: 31392658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Dialysis adequacy and nutritional status of hemodialysis patients.
    Teixeira Nunes F; de Campos G; Xavier de Paula SM; Merhi VA; Portero-McLellan KC; da Motta DG; de Oliveira MR
    Hemodial Int; 2008 Jan; 12(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 18271840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of methods to estimate haemodialysis urea clearance.
    Mohamed A; Davenport A
    Int J Artif Organs; 2018 Jul; 41(7):371-377. PubMed ID: 29642725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Impact of targeting Kt instead of Kt/V.
    Maduell F; Ramos R; Palomares I; Martín-Malo A; Molina M; Bustamante J; Pérez-García R; Grassmann A; Merello JI;
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2013 Oct; 28(10):2595-603. PubMed ID: 24078643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Ionic dialysance and quality control in hemodialysis].
    Petitclerc T; Coevoet B
    Nephrologie; 2001; 22(5):191-7. PubMed ID: 11572165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Biostat 1000 and Daugirdas blood-based hemodialysis quantification: agreement and reproducibility.
    Marshall MR; Santamaria P; Collins JF
    Am J Kidney Dis; 1998 Jun; 31(6):1011-8. PubMed ID: 9631847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.