166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24635123)
1. The effect of unmeasured confounders on the ability to estimate a true performance or selection gradient (and other partial regression coefficients).
Walker JA
Evolution; 2014 Jul; 68(7):2128-36. PubMed ID: 24635123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of short-term exposure to air pollution on hospital admissions of young children for acute lower respiratory infections in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
; Le TG; Ngo L; Mehta S; Do VD; Thach TQ; Vu XD; Nguyen DT; Cohen A
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 Jun; (169):5-72; discussion 73-83. PubMed ID: 22849236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies.
McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Levy A
Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(11):2331-47. PubMed ID: 16998821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies.
Lin DY; Psaty BM; Kronmal RA
Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):948-63. PubMed ID: 9750244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On a preference-based instrumental variable approach in reducing unmeasured confounding-by-indication.
Li Y; Lee Y; Wolfe RA; Morgenstern H; Zhang J; Port FK; Robinson BM
Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1150-68. PubMed ID: 25546152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using the bootstrap to improve estimation and confidence intervals for regression coefficients selected using backwards variable elimination.
Austin PC
Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(17):3286-300. PubMed ID: 17940997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The sign of the unmeasured confounding bias under various standard populations.
Chiba Y
Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):670-6. PubMed ID: 19650054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounding for binary outcomes using confounding functions.
Kasza J; Wolfe R; Schuster T
Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 46(4):1303-1311. PubMed ID: 28338913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-stage instrumental variable methods for estimating the causal odds ratio: analysis of bias.
Cai B; Small DS; Have TR
Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1809-24. PubMed ID: 21495062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing causal treatment effect estimation when using large observational datasets.
John ER; Abrams KR; Brightling CE; Sheehan NA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):207. PubMed ID: 31726969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prior event rate ratio adjustment: numerical studies of a statistical method to address unrecognized confounding in observational studies.
Yu M; Xie D; Wang X; Weiner MG; Tannen RL
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 May; 21 Suppl 2():60-8. PubMed ID: 22552981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the impact of unmeasured confounding with internal validation data: an example cost evaluation in type 2 diabetes.
Faries D; Peng X; Pawaskar M; Price K; Stamey JD; Seaman JW
Value Health; 2013; 16(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 23538177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simulation sample sizes for Monte Carlo partial EVPI calculations.
Oakley JE; Brennan A; Tappenden P; Chilcott J
J Health Econ; 2010 May; 29(3):468-77. PubMed ID: 20378190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The number of subjects per variable required in linear regression analyses.
Austin PC; Steyerberg EW
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 68(6):627-36. PubMed ID: 25704724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regularized Regression Versus the High-Dimensional Propensity Score for Confounding Adjustment in Secondary Database Analyses.
Franklin JM; Eddings W; Glynn RJ; Schneeweiss S
Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 182(7):651-9. PubMed ID: 26233956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sample size importantly limits the usefulness of instrumental variable methods, depending on instrument strength and level of confounding.
Boef AG; Dekkers OM; Vandenbroucke JP; le Cessie S
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Nov; 67(11):1258-64. PubMed ID: 25124167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis and Bayesian analysis of smoking as an unmeasured confounder in a study of silica and lung cancer.
Steenland K; Greenland S
Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 160(4):384-92. PubMed ID: 15286024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of unmeasured within- and between-cluster confounding on the bias of effect estimatorsof a continuous exposure.
Li Y; Lee Y; Port FK; Robinson BM
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Aug; 29(8):2119-2139. PubMed ID: 31694489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
