168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24635123)
21. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Bias Formulas for Estimating Direct and Indirect Effects When Unmeasured Confounding Is Present.
le Cessie S
Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 26426943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.
Arah OA; Chiba Y; Greenland S
Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 18(8):637-46. PubMed ID: 18652982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Estimating linear regression models in the presence of a censored independent variable.
Austin PC; Hoch JS
Stat Med; 2004 Feb; 23(3):411-29. PubMed ID: 14748036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Analysis of longitudinal data with unmeasured confounders.
Palta M; Yao TJ
Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1355-69. PubMed ID: 1786323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of categorization method, regression type, and variable distribution on the inflation of Type-I error rate when categorizing a confounding variable.
Barnwell-Ménard JL; Li Q; Cohen AA
Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(6):936-49. PubMed ID: 25504513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A sensitivity analysis using information about measured confounders yielded improved uncertainty assessments for unmeasured confounding.
McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Levy AR
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 61(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 18226747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The alarming problems of confounding equivalence using logistic regression models in the perspective of causal diagrams.
Yu Y; Li H; Sun X; Su P; Wang T; Liu Y; Yuan Z; Liu Y; Xue F
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):177. PubMed ID: 29281984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Interpreting treatment-effect estimates with heterogeneity and choice: simulation model results.
Brooks JM; Fang G
Clin Ther; 2009 Apr; 31(4):902-19. PubMed ID: 19446162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Adjusting for bias and unmeasured confounding in Mendelian randomization studies with binary responses.
Palmer TM; Thompson JR; Tobin MD; Sheehan NA; Burton PR
Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 37(5):1161-8. PubMed ID: 18463132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of Bayesian and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding.
McCandless LC; Gustafson P
Stat Med; 2017 Aug; 36(18):2887-2901. PubMed ID: 28386994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sensitivity analyses for unmeasured confounding assuming a marginal structural model for repeated measures.
Brumback BA; Hernán MA; Haneuse SJ; Robins JM
Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(5):749-67. PubMed ID: 14981673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The impact of residual and unmeasured confounding in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study.
Fewell Z; Davey Smith G; Sterne JA
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 166(6):646-55. PubMed ID: 17615092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Correlated measurement error--implications for nutritional epidemiology.
Day NE; Wong MY; Bingham S; Khaw KT; Luben R; Michels KB; Welch A; Wareham NJ
Int J Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 33(6):1373-81. PubMed ID: 15333617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sensitivity analyses to estimate the potential impact of unmeasured confounding in causal research.
Groenwold RH; Nelson DB; Nichol KL; Hoes AW; Hak E
Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Feb; 39(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 19948779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Bias testing, bias correction, and confounder selection using an instrumental variable model.
Yeob Choi B; Fine JP; Alan Brookhart M
Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(29):4386-4404. PubMed ID: 32854161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Inflation of the type I error rate when a continuous confounding variable is categorized in logistic regression analyses.
Austin PC; Brunner LJ
Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(7):1159-78. PubMed ID: 15057884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study.
Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Normand SL; Anderson GM
Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):754-68. PubMed ID: 16783757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. How unmeasured confounding in a competing risks setting can affect treatment effect estimates in observational studies.
Barrowman MA; Peek N; Lambie M; Martin GP; Sperrin M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):166. PubMed ID: 31366331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bias analysis of the instrumental variable estimator as an estimator of the average causal effect.
Chiba Y
Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Jan; 31(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 19879376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
