These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24635123)

  • 41. Invited commentary: variable selection versus shrinkage in the control of multiple confounders.
    Greenland S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 167(5):523-9; discussion 530-1. PubMed ID: 18227100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Weaknesses of goodness-of-fit tests for evaluating propensity score models: the case of the omitted confounder.
    Weitzen S; Lapane KL; Toledano AY; Hume AL; Mor V
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2005 Apr; 14(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 15386700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. On model selection and model misspecification in causal inference.
    Vansteelandt S; Bekaert M; Claeskens G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2012 Feb; 21(1):7-30. PubMed ID: 21075803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Confounder selection in environmental epidemiology: assessment of health effects of prenatal mercury exposure.
    Budtz-Jørgensen E; Keiding N; Grandjean P; Weihe P
    Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 17(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17027287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in causal mediation analysis.
    McCandless LC; Somers JM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Feb; 28(2):515-531. PubMed ID: 28882092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Combating unmeasured confounding in cross-sectional studies: evaluating instrumental-variable and Heckman selection models.
    DeMaris A
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Sep; 19(3):380-97. PubMed ID: 25110904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.
    Springate SD
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21447784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A sensitivity analysis of bias in relative risk estimates due to disinfection by-product exposure misclassification.
    Wright JM; Bateson TF
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2005 May; 15(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 15226753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. External adjustment for unmeasured confounders improved drug-outcome association estimates based on health care utilization data.
    Corrao G; Nicotra F; Parodi A; Zambon A; Soranna D; Heiman F; Merlino L; Mancia G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1190-9. PubMed ID: 23017636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Sample size for multiple regression: obtaining regression coefficients that are accurate, not simply significant.
    Kelley K; Maxwell SE
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Sep; 8(3):305-21. PubMed ID: 14596493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Adjustment for unmeasured confounding through informative priors for the confounder-outcome relation.
    Groenwold RHH; Shofty I; Miočević M; van Smeden M; Klugkist I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):174. PubMed ID: 30577773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Regression models for public health surveillance data: a simulation study.
    Kim H; Kriebel D
    Occup Environ Med; 2009 Nov; 66(11):733-9. PubMed ID: 19687020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Heterogeneous treatment effects: what does a regression estimate?
    Rhodes W
    Eval Rev; 2010 Aug; 34(4):334-61. PubMed ID: 20647500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Bayesian propensity score analysis for observational data.
    McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(1):94-112. PubMed ID: 19012268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Nonlinear genetic relationships between traits and their implications on the estimation of genetic parameters.
    Fuerst-Waltl B; Essl A; Sölkner J
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Dec; 75(12):3119-25. PubMed ID: 9419984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A Monte-Carlo estimation of effect size distortion due to significance testing.
    Bradley MT; Smith D; Stoica G
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):837-42. PubMed ID: 12509183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A potential bias in the temporal method for estimating Ne in admixed populations under natural selection.
    Araki H; Waples RS; Blouin MS
    Mol Ecol; 2007 Jun; 16(11):2261-71. PubMed ID: 17561889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Performance of prior event rate ratio adjustment method in pharmacoepidemiology: a simulation study.
    Uddin MJ; Groenwold RH; van Staa TP; de Boer A; Belitser SV; Hoes AW; Roes KC; Klungel OH
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2015 May; 24(5):468-77. PubMed ID: 25410590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effects of active metabolites on parameter estimation in linear mixed effect models of concentration-QT analyses.
    Bonate PL
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2013 Feb; 40(1):101-15. PubMed ID: 23288469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Sensitivity analysis for the effects of multiple unmeasured confounders.
    Groenwold RH; Sterne JA; Lawlor DA; Moons KG; Hoes AW; Tilling K
    Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):605-11. PubMed ID: 27576907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.