These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24635185)

  • 1. The reminding effect: presentation of associates enhances memory for related words in a list.
    Tullis JG; Benjamin AS; Ross BH
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Aug; 143(4):1526-40. PubMed ID: 24635185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Remindings influence the interpretation of ambiguous stimuli.
    Tullis JG; Braverman M; Ross BH; Benjamin AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Feb; 21(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 23835617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of retrieval during study: Evidence of reminding from self-paced study time.
    McKinley GL; Ross BH; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):877-892. PubMed ID: 30725375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [An alternative word-list for the Free and cued selective reminding test (FCSRT): list presentation and reliability study].
    Stoykova R; Matharan F; Raoux N; Amieva H
    Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil; 2013 Sep; 11(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 24026134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of reminding in the effects of spaced repetitions on cued recall: sufficient but not necessary.
    Wahlheim CN; Maddox GB; Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 23937236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the importance of looking back: the role of recursive remindings in recency judgments and cued recall.
    Jacoby LL; Wahlheim CN
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Jul; 41(5):625-37. PubMed ID: 23371792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of the encoding factors that produce the negative repetition effect.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):765-75. PubMed ID: 24548323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of study context on item recollection.
    Skinner EI; Fernandes MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1318-34. PubMed ID: 19890765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examining the contributions of desirable difficulty and reminding to the spacing effect.
    Maddox GB; Pyc MA; Kauffman ZS; Gatewood JD; Schonhoff AM
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1376-1388. PubMed ID: 30047090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison versus reminding.
    Tullis JG; Goldstone RL
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2016; 1(1):20. PubMed ID: 28180171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of pure pair repetition on younger and older adults' associative memory.
    Kilb A; Naveh-Benjamin M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 May; 37(3):706-19. PubMed ID: 21341929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using maintenance rehearsal to explore recognition memory.
    Humphreys MS; Maguire AM; McFarlane KA; Burt JS; Bolland SW; Murray KL; Dunn R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):147-59. PubMed ID: 20053051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
    Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When does prior knowledge disproportionately benefit older adults' memory?
    Badham SP; Hay M; Foxon N; Kaur K; Maylor EA
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2016; 23(3):338-65. PubMed ID: 26473767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnosing criterion-level effects on memory: what aspects of memory are enhanced by repeated retrieval?
    Vaughn KE; Rawson KA
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1127-31. PubMed ID: 21813798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pretesting boosts recognition, but not cued recall, of targets from unrelated word pairs.
    Seabrooke T; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Hollins TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Feb; 28(1):268-273. PubMed ID: 32959192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Encoding modality can affect memory accuracy via retrieval orientation.
    Pierce BH; Gallo DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):516-21. PubMed ID: 21261425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repetition effects in associative false recognition: Theme-based criterion shifts are the exception, not the rule.
    Starns JJ; Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):742-61. PubMed ID: 16829490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Directed forgetting in the list method affects recognition memory for source.
    Gottlob LR; Golding JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Nov; 60(11):1524-39. PubMed ID: 17853219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. False recognition following study of semantically related lists presented in jumbled word form.
    Halcomb SH; Taylor JP; DeSouza KD; Wallace WP
    Memory; 2008 May; 16(4):443-61. PubMed ID: 18432488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.