These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24635202)

  • 1. Assessing the speed--accuracy trade-off effect on the capacity of information processing.
    Donkin C; Little DR; Houpt JW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1183-202. PubMed ID: 24635202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two components in IOR: evidence for response bias and perceptual processing delays using the SAT methodology.
    Zhao Y; Heinke D; Ivanoff J; Klein RM; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2143-59. PubMed ID: 21789695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is There Evidence for a Mixture of Processes in Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off Behavior?
    van Maanen L
    Top Cogn Sci; 2016 Jan; 8(1):279-90. PubMed ID: 26748686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new measure of group decision-making efficiency.
    Hsieh CJ; Fifić M; Yang CT
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Sep; 5(1):45. PubMed ID: 32940791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial attention does improve temporal discrimination.
    Chica AB; Christie J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 19304617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective attention and subjective confidence calibration.
    Schoenherr JR; Leth-Steensen C; Petrusic WM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):353-68. PubMed ID: 20139451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forward and backward repetition blindness in speed and accuracy.
    Wong KF; Chen HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):778-86. PubMed ID: 19485691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulus exposure and gaze bias: a further test of the gaze cascade model.
    Glaholt MG; Reingold EM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):445-50. PubMed ID: 19304635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual attention in a complex search task differs between honeybees and bumblebees.
    Morawetz L; Spaethe J
    J Exp Biol; 2012 Jul; 215(Pt 14):2515-23. PubMed ID: 22723491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Redundancy gains in simple responses and go/no-go tasks.
    Gondan M; Götze C; Greenlee MW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1692-709. PubMed ID: 20675811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays.
    Smith PL; Ratcliff R; Wolfgang BJ
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1297-320. PubMed ID: 15066392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating the growth of internal evidence guiding perceptual decisions.
    Ludwig CJ; Davies JR
    Cogn Psychol; 2011 Sep; 63(2):61-92. PubMed ID: 21699877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective view of the impact of prime validity on response speed and selection in the arrow classification task with free choice trials.
    Perry JR; Lupker SJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 20139465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A test of Bayesian observer models of processing in the Eriksen flanker task.
    White CN; Brown S; Ratcliff R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):489-97. PubMed ID: 22103757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Demands on attention and the role of response priming in visual discrimination of feature conjunctions.
    Fournier LR; Herbert RJ; Farris C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):836-52. PubMed ID: 15462624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct versus indirect processing changes the influence of color in natural scene categorization.
    Otsuka S; Kawaguchi J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1588-97. PubMed ID: 19801618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speed and accuracy of accessing information in working memory: an individual differences investigation of focus switching.
    Unsworth N; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):616-30. PubMed ID: 18444760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trade-offs between gaze and working memory use.
    Droll JA; Hayhoe MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1352-65. PubMed ID: 18085948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adding a speed-accuracy trade-off to discrete-state models: A comment on Heck and Erdfelder (2016).
    Starns JJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2406-2416. PubMed ID: 29532263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beyond decision! Motor contribution to speed-accuracy trade-off in decision-making.
    Spieser L; Servant M; Hasbroucq T; Burle B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):950-956. PubMed ID: 27757924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.