These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2463531)

  • 21. Measurements of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in pacemaker patients at rest: effects of various atrioventricular delays.
    Ovsyshcher I; Zimlichman R; Katz A; Bondy C; Furman S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Mar; 21(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 8436759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick sinus syndrome: the role of retrograde ventriculoatrial conduction.
    Kolk R; Samarütel J; Väli J
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1994; 83(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 7857066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Differentiating pacemaker-mediated tachycardia from tachycardia due to atrial tracking: utility of V-A-A-V versus V-A-V response after postventricular atrial refractory period extension.
    Ip JE; Markowitz SM; Liu CF; Cheung JW; Thomas G; Lerman BB
    Heart Rhythm; 2011 Aug; 8(8):1185-91. PubMed ID: 21376834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. VDD single pass lead pacing: sustained pacemaker mediated tachycardias unrelated to retrograde atrial activation.
    Sermasi S; Marconi M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1903-7. PubMed ID: 1279569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Uncommon presentation of drug-refractory pacemaker-mediated common atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and a simple solution by reprogramming.
    Horie K; Otomo K; Mori S; Kikuchi Y; Meguro T
    Intern Med; 2015; 54(9):1063-6. PubMed ID: 25948348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dual chamber pacing: how many patients remain in DDD mode over the long term?
    Ibrahim B; Sanderson JE; Wright B; Palmer R
    Br Heart J; 1995 Jul; 74(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 7662461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Retrograde (ventriculoatrial) conduction in congenital complete heart block.
    Zilo P; Gross JN; Andrews CA; Furman S
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Oct; 14(10):1538-43. PubMed ID: 1721136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Method of atrioventricular programming in atrial flutter in patients with biventricular pacemaker.
    Naqvi TZ; Barnett W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Aug; 30(8):948-56. PubMed ID: 17669076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers.
    Rediker DE; Eagle KA; Homma S; Gillam LD; Harthorne JW
    Am J Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 61(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 3341209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [30 years cardiac pacemaker therapy: a status evaluation].
    Stangl K; Wirtzfeld A; Alt E; Blömer H
    Z Kardiol; 1990 Jun; 79(6):383-95. PubMed ID: 2198730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sustained inhibition of a DDD pacemaker at rates below the programmed lower rate during automatic PVARP extension.
    Barold SS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Mar; 22(3):521-4. PubMed ID: 10192862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing.
    Hesselson AB; Parsonnet V; Bernstein AD; Bonavita GJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Jun; 19(7):1542-9. PubMed ID: 1593051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pacemaker syndrome induced by the mode switching algorithm of a DDDR pacemaker.
    Jaïs P; Barold S; Shah DC; Takahashi A; Hocini M; Haïssaguerre M; Clémenty J
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Apr; 22(4 Pt 1):682-5. PubMed ID: 10234726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. DDD versus VVIR versus VVI mode in patients with indication to dual-chamber stimulation: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study.
    Moro E; Caprioglio F; Berton G; Marcon C; Riva U; Corbucci G; Delise P
    Ital Heart J; 2005 Sep; 6(9):728-33. PubMed ID: 16212074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Pacemaker syndrome and retrograde ventriculoatrial conduction].
    Shen LH; Na KX; Gu FS
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 1989 Aug; 17(4):206-7, 252. PubMed ID: 2627875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Experience and implantation techniques with a new single-pass lead VDD pacing system.
    Longo E; Catrini V
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Jul; 13(7):927-36. PubMed ID: 1695750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predictive value of the P wave at implantation for atrial fibrillation after VVI pacemaker implantation.
    Snoeck J; Decoster H; Vrints C; Marchand X; Kahn JC; Verherstraeten M; Berkhof M; Franque L
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):2077-83. PubMed ID: 1279603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Long-term ECG as a decision aid in indications for a permanent pacemaker].
    Sterz H
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1988 Jan; 138(1-2):18-21. PubMed ID: 3354220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Single-chamber ventricular pacing increases markers of left ventricular dysfunction compared with dual-chamber pacing.
    Naegeli B; Kurz DJ; Koller D; Straumann E; Furrer M; Maurer D; Minder E; Bertel O
    Europace; 2007 Mar; 9(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 17272326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The dynamic nature of ventriculoatrial conduction.
    Klementowicz P; Ausubel K; Furman S
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1986 Nov; 9(6):1050-4. PubMed ID: 2432508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.